[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry commented on WFCORE-4170: ------------------------------------------ I wonder if at some point we should revisit not including PB in core. The PB jars themselves add about 1MB but at this point the core zip is 30MB so this isn't a big difference, and not shipping it results in ugly hacks. And the galleon layer stuff can help users reach the key objective of not including it in their dist regardless of what FP it is shipped in. One caution though is the org.picketbox module comes with a ton of dependencies most of which should not be in core even if PB was. Mostly optional ones, and others perhaps could be. {code} <module name="org.picketbox" xmlns="urn:jboss:module:1.5"> <!-- This module is deprecated and subject to being removed in a subsequent release. --> <properties> <property name="jboss.api" value="deprecated"/> </properties> <resources> <resource-root path="picketbox-5.0.3.Final.jar"/> <resource-root path="picketbox-infinispan-5.0.3.Final.jar"/> <resource-root path="picketbox-commons-1.0.0.final.jar"/> </resources> <dependencies> <module name="javax.api"/> <module name="javax.persistence.api" optional="true"/> <module name="javax.resource.api" optional="true"/> <module name="javax.security.auth.message.api" optional="true"/> <module name="javax.security.jacc.api"/> <module name="javax.servlet.api"/> <module name="javax.transaction.api" optional="true"/> <module name="javax.xml.bind.api" optional="true"/> <module name="javax.xml.stream.api" optional="true"/> <module name="org.jboss.logging"/> <module name="org.infinispan" optional="true"/> <module name="org.jboss.security.xacml" optional="true"/> <module name="org.jboss.modules" optional="true"/> <module name="sun.jdk"/> </dependencies> </module> {code} I'm not advocating making this any kind of a priority, particularly if it wouldn't be simple. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)