[jbosscache-dev] Re: JBossCache_1_4_1_SP1 tagged
When did you introduce this use of non-serializable objects? The
exception on line 318 in the TreeCacheMarshaller has been around
since 1.4.0.GA.
Anyway, I can change this in TCM based on whether jboss serialization
is being used, it's easy enough and does make sense.
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 31 Jan 2007, at 15:23, Ben Wang wrote:
Manik,
Upon a closer look, the reason that it is failing now is because
from PojoCache, we allow to replicate non-Seriliazable object if we
use JBossSerialization. But it seems now that
TreeCacheMarshaller140 (line 318) has tightened up the criteria to
throw exception when it is non-Serializable. So what's your
suggestion?
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:14 AM
To: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; Ben Wang
Subject: JBossCache_1_4_1_SP1 tagged
Tagged and *almost* ready for QA.
There are 2 AOP tests that seem to fail quite consistently, apart
from that it is looking pretty stable.
Ben, do you think you'd have a moment to have a quick look? I
can't imagine what has changed on the AOP side of things on this
branch.
The tests are
org.jboss.cache.aop.collection.CachedListImplAopTest
org.jboss.cache.aop.ReplicatedSerializableAopTest
Thanks,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani