+1. I'd prefer it over the FCL anyway.
On 4 Apr 2007, at 03:56, Brian Stansberry wrote:
The stress testing Philip Thurmond's been doing on ejb3
clustering
has surfaced an issue with FileCacheLoader (see http://
jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-937). Basically we're hitting
file system limits on the number of directories.
I can fix the issue by making a simple change to the structure of
cached data. There would be a performance hit from that (probably
not large). But, since we recommend not using FileCacheLoader
anyway, I was planning to work on getting away from FileCacheLoader
anyway for AS 5; this issue tempts me to do it now.
What do people think about using JdbmCacheLoader instead of
FileCacheLoader? It's been part of JBC for nearly a year now, and
I'm not aware of any problems with it. Elias, I'd particularly like
your opinion on this, as you obviously know the most about
JdbmCacheLoader and probably know the most about JDBM.
QE's doing intensive stress testing of 4.2, so if we switch
JdbmCacheLoader will be put through its paces.
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani