Manik Surtani wrote:
Ok - so we could add an extra check into the view change listener to
force an unblock if a member who initiated a FLUSH dies. We would
also have to record the address of the member initiating the FLUSH in
the flushBlockGate.
+1.
I'm also puzzled as to why this could evade detection for so long...
Have we started to use channels in a different way now ? E.g. concurrent
startup ?
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat