Re: [jbosscache-dev] Pulling the FileCacheLoader from 3.0.0
On 1 Apr 2008, at 16:38, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>
> Re: FileChannel, locking is less important since I have implemented
> locking on a per-Fqn basis in the FCL [1] - agreed the FileChannel
> stuff may be better, but it's a less urgent need since locking
> isn't a problem with the FCL anymore.
If the FCL is used with a shared=true you need to coordinate access
to the filesystem.
Unless I'm mistaken, the FileChannel lock won't do that either?
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org