Seeing this email, I was thinking that I could commit now the changes in JDBCCacheLoader
(to use VAM instead of Standard Serialization which in terms of functionality, it's
working) and the VAM performance unit test that I'm about to finish.
We could the focus on VAM regression and profiling for BETA2. We would have the unit test
in place and we could start testing and extending it to cover other types of objects
here.
This would also allow me to introduce c3p0 connection pooling for BETA1 on time.
Manik, what do you think? And the rest?
Galder ZamarreƱo
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
IT executives: Red Hat still #1 for value
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Manik Surtani
Sent: 11 January 2007 11:13
To: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc: QA
Subject: [jbosscache-dev] Habanero BETAs
Guys,
Now that Alpha2 has been released and is in the wild, can we focus on
BETA1 tasks and target to have these cleared by Monday the 22nd so QA
has time to very thoroughly test and release by the 25th.
Please let me know your thoughts on this, or if you have any concerns
about tasks that may not be complete by then. Pls refer to
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE
for the tasks I have scheduled for BETA1. The goal is to be both
feature complete and to freeze the API. Profiling, benching and
refactoring for BETA2.
Thanks,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev