Re: [jbosscache-dev] jboss-javaee.jar shipped with JBC

Its just licensing differences and source availability (at least historically). Ours is lgpl, sun's should be dual cddl/proprietary, but that would have to be validated. Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > Regarding the javaee apis, I believe there is a licensing issue, > whether we ship the Sun provided libraries or ours (the content > should be the same). > > Scott? > > Brian Stansberry wrote: >> No, not sure what that one is; looks like something official from >> Sun given its pom [1]. Seems the one I'm talking about is only a >> CR1: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/javaee/jboss-transaction-api... >> >> Dimitris -- do you see any advantage in JBC integrating the >> org.jboss.javaee/jboss-transaction-api.jar vs this javax/ >> transaction/jta-1.1.jar? AFAICT, seems like both just contain JTA >> 1.1 version of the javax.transaction packages. (Why do we produce >> our own if Sun already produces one?) The AS is going to integrate >> the full org.jboss.javaee/jboss-javaee.jar so either way there's >> going to be a trivial maven dependency mismatch so we'll just >> exclude the JBC dependency in the AS pom. >> >> [1] http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/javax/transaction/jta/1.1/jta-1.1.pom >> >> Manik Surtani wrote: >>> I'm guessing that's jta-1.1.jar? >>> >>> On 15 May 2008, at 15:27, Brian Stansberry wrote: >>> >>>> The jboss-javaee project has recently been refactored so that >>>> jar is now an assembly of a set of jars for each of the specs >>>> that comprise JEE; there should be a jta-only component jar as >>>> well. I'll find it for you. >>>> >>>> Manik Surtani wrote: >>>>> Guys, >>>>> The only reason we ship jboss-javaee.jar with JBC is for the >>>>> JTA interfaces. jboss-javaee.jar, however, brings along with >>>>> it whole bunch of excess baggage, which (1) makes the distro >>>>> unnecessarily large, and (2) causes problems in some >>>>> environments [1]. >>>>> Can anyone see anything wrong with dropping jboss-javaee.jar >>>>> and replacing it with jta-1.1.jar [2]? I'm guessing we'd need >>>>> to make sure this is marked as optional in Maven, so it can be >>>>> excluded from projects that get deployed in an EE environment >>>>> (or any other environment where JTA is provided). >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> Manik >>>>> [1] http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1347 >>>>> [2] http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/javax/transaction/jta/1.1/ >>>>> -- >>>>> Manik Surtani >>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>>>> manik(a)jboss.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list >>>>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brian Stansberry >>>> Lead, AS Clustering >>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>>> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com >>> >>> -- >>> Manik Surtani >>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>> manik(a)jboss.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >