Brian Stansberry wrote:
I'm sure this is discussed on a thread if someone wants to
search. :)
I'm lazy so I'll just guess about the reason. Going through the
interceptor chain adds all sorts of possibly unwanted side effects;
e.g. creation of in-memory nodes cause writes to persistent store,
replication, gravitation, etc. Many can be eliminated by setting
options, but thinking through all the ways it can break will take a
lot of work and it will inherently be fragile.
Manik's right though; my question was about the Node Modified bit. :)
Yeah I think there was an overhead of locking all these nodes or
something along these lines.
Node Modified bit - I am not sure why we did not do it. Maybe as you say
- we forgot.