Manik, I am not sure what is "more correct" though? To me, I can see right away that PojoCache is a feature, but have a hard time to tell the difference between it and Cache without explaining it in details. I don't know what others think but it doesn't convey the right functionality that is a HasMap-like "reference" cache. Of course, detailed explanation will work but key is to first time user, will this create confusion or not? -Ben -----Original Message----- From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik@jboss.org] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:00 PM To: Ben Wang Cc: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jbosscache-dev] Naming discussion On 11 Aug 2006, at 12:17, Ben Wang wrote: I agree that Cache vs. PojoCache is less distinct than TreeCache vs. PojoCache, but at the end of the day we're trying to define a product that does a single task of caching data. As you said, PojoCache builds on top of this to add Pojo/AOP based features, so one may argue that Cache vs. PojoCache, while being less distinct, is in fact more correct.