July 2007 - jbossts-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-258) BaseTransaction in jtax tree swallows error message as per veersion in jta tree

by Andrew Dinn (JIRA)

BaseTransaction in jtax tree swallows error message as per veersion in jta tree ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-258 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-258 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Patch Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTS Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Andrew Dinn Assigned To: Andrew Dinn Priority: Minor Fix For: 4.4 The patch to the jta version of BaseTransaction supplied to resolve the loss of error context information (described in JBTM-250) also needs to be applied to the version of BaseTransaction in the jtax tree. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-250) BaseTransaction swallows a critical error message

by Andrew P (JIRA)

BaseTransaction swallows a critical error message ------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-250 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-250 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Patch Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP3 Reporter: Andrew P Assigned To: Mark Little Priority: Minor Attachments: BaseTransaction.java.patch Patch is against the latest trunk, r13242. JTA's base transaction throws NotSupportedException for attempts to begin a nested transaction. However, the root cause's message is lost which forces one into scratching his head and diving into all kinds of debug hell. The patch propagates the message, which is quite descriptive and save from late night debugging sessions :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

4
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-271) Create a wiki page for non-serializable XAResource recovery questions

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Create a wiki page for non-serializable XAResource recovery questions --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-271 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-271 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: JTA Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-254) SyncronizationRecord impls must be Comparable

by Jonathan Halliday (JIRA)

SyncronizationRecord impls must be Comparable --------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-254 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-254 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: WS-T Implementation Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP5 Reporter: Jonathan Halliday Assigned To: Jonathan Halliday Fix For: 4.4 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] java.lang.ClassCastException: com.arjuna.mwlab s.wscf.model.twophase.arjunacore.SynchronizationRecord 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] at java.util.TreeMap.compare(TreeMap.java:109 3) 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] at java.util.TreeMap.put(TreeMap.java:465) 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] at java.util.TreeSet.add(TreeSet.java:210) 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] at com.arjuna.ats.arjuna.coordinator.TwoPhase Coordinator.addSynchronization(TwoPhaseCoordinator.java:146) 2007-07-10 14:40:07,578 INFO (TaskWorker-1) [STDOUT] at com.arjuna.mwlabs.wscf.model.twophase.arju nacore.ACCoordinator.enlistSynchronization(ACCoordinator.java:213) SyncronizationRecords must impl Comparable (side effect of the changes for Sync ordering used by JTA 1.1) Update Interface and XTS impls accordingly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

1
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-239) Document new statistics gathering routines.

by Mark Little (JIRA)

Document new statistics gathering routines. ------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-239 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-239 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Documentation Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Mark Little Fix For: 4.4 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBTM-222) TestLevels common test does not work on Windows

by Mark Little (JIRA)

TestLevels common test does not work on Windows ----------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-222 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-222 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Testing Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP3 Environment: Windows XP SP2. JRockit 5.0. Reporter: Mark Little Assigned To: Jonathan Halliday Fix For: 4.4 TestLevels.java doesn't run correctly on Windows. It looks as though there could be a few things wrong: (i) log4j isn't initialised correctly (though that could be local to my environment). (ii) the test doesn't account for the differences in Windows versus Un*x formatting, so for example where there should only be 5 lines of debugging (and are on Un*x), there are 9 on Windows because there are 4 blank lines. (iii) the resource bundle TestLevels_en_GB is not picked up, so the regex fails. (iv) naming of threads is slightly different on Windows to Un*x .line 0 DEBUG [main] (TestLevels.java:89) com.hp.mwtests.commonlogging.testlevels.TestLevels.writeLogMessages(TestLevels.java:89) - [testMessage] This is the 1st message, logged at level debug. .line 0 DEBUG [Main Thread] (TestLevels.java:89) com.hp.mwtests.commonlogging.testlevels.TestLevels.writeLogMessages(TestLevels.java:89) - no default resource bundle set for this logger: [key='testMessage']1st, debug, I'm using JRockit and am unsure which of the above are due entirely to my setup, but if at least one of them is general it will cause the test to fail on Windows anyway. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 2 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBTM-217) Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java

by Andrew Dinn (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=all ] Andrew Dinn closed JBTM-217. ---------------------------- Resolution: Incomplete Description > Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBTM-217 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217 > Project: JBoss Transaction Manager > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: JTA Implementation > Affects Versions: 4.2.3 > Reporter: Phillip Thurmond > Assigned To: Andrew Dinn > Fix For: 4.4 > > Time Spent: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes > > Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBTM-217) Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java

by Andrew Dinn (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=comments#action_12369690 ] Andrew Dinn commented on JBTM-217: ---------------------------------- Yes, that would be easy to do. However, Mark does not want the jtax layer to use any non-standard hooks into the JTA/JTS codebase. That way the AS can maintain interoperability with other Transaction Service implementations. So, we must only rely on the javax.transaction API. Was that the rationale for not using the transaction implementation last time? > Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBTM-217 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217 > Project: JBoss Transaction Manager > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: JTA Implementation > Affects Versions: 4.2.3 > Reporter: Phillip Thurmond > Assigned To: Andrew Dinn > Fix For: 4.4 > > Time Spent: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes > > Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBTM-217) Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java

by Kevin Conner (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=comments#action_12369579 ] Kevin Conner commented on JBTM-217: ----------------------------------- The easiest solution is for this to be supported directly by the transaction implementation. This was a possibility at the time but I can't remember the reason for not doing it. > Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBTM-217 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217 > Project: JBoss Transaction Manager > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: JTA Implementation > Affects Versions: 4.2.3 > Reporter: Phillip Thurmond > Assigned To: Andrew Dinn > Fix For: 4.4 > > Time Spent: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes > > Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBTM-50) Open source WS-Context implementation

by Mark Little (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-50?page=comments#action_12369554 ] Mark Little commented on JBTM-50: --------------------------------- Yes, that's a pretty good summary :-) Last time it was dusted off was end 2004, start of 2005. > Open source WS-Context implementation > ------------------------------------- > > Key: JBTM-50 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-50 > Project: JBoss Transaction Manager > Issue Type: Task > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: WS-T Implementation > Reporter: Mark Little > Assigned To: Jonathan Halliday > Fix For: 4.4 > > Time Spent: 1 hour > Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

jbossts-issues July 2007