[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Michael Musgrove commented on JBTM-939:
---------------------------------------
That last failure was in CrashRecovery02_2_Test28 on hoboken (the other jobs have gone).
The original fix was for test CrashRecovery02_2_Test31. So the question is do we keep
extending timeouts for specific tests or do we extend the timeout for all tests in group
CrashRecovery02_2? What do you think? If we go for extend timeout for specific tests then
TEST-org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2.txt tells us which
test failed.
Fix intermittant qa suite failure:
org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-939
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-939
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Testing
Reporter: Tom Jenkinson
Assignee: Michael Musgrove
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 5.0.0.M2, 4.17.3
Attachments: crashrecovery02_2.tgz
Assuming failure in test rather than failed test:
>>>>> org.jboss.jbossts.qa.junit.testgroup.TestGroup_crashrecovery02_2
>>>>> [junit] Tests run: 50, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira