[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1689) "jta" vs. "jts" profile seems duplicate
[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Weinan Li updated JBTM-1689:
----------------------------
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Description:
"jta" vs. "jts" profile, they seem to build the same modules except
for ArjunaJTS.
As maven has some built in options for selecting which modules/directories to build, would
it be better to just use those options? Instead of defining profiles, it might look
something like "mvn install -pl common,ArjunaCore" instead of the build profile
"mvn install -Pcore"
was:
Currently we have tanuki in these components:
{code}
ArjunaCore/arjuna/services/pom.xml
ArjunaJTS/narayana-jts-idlj/pom.xml
ArjunaJTS/narayana-jts-jacorb/pom.xml
pom.xml
{code}
{code}
<dependency>
<groupId>tanukisoft</groupId>
<artifactId>wrapper</artifactId>
<version>${version.tanukisoft}</version>
</dependency>
{code}
We need to remove these dependencies from eap6 profile according to comments from
Fernando:
{quote}
We do not ship tanukiwrapper with the AS (the windows on is an exceptional case and for
different reasons).
It is not in the AS7 dependencies, and it will be hard for Support to
properly rebuild TS in the field.
{quote}
btw, there are two classes we need to remove from eap6 profile which depends on tanuki
wrapper:
{code}
ArjunaCore/arjuna/classes/com/arjuna/ats/arjuna/services/recovery/RecoveryManagerService.java
ArjunaJTS/jts/services/classes/com/arjuna/ats/jts/services/transactionserver/TransactionServerService.java
{code}
"jta" vs. "jts" profile seems duplicate
---------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-1689
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1689
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: 4.17.4
Reporter: Weinan Li
Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
Priority: Minor
"jta" vs. "jts" profile, they seem to build the same modules except
for ArjunaJTS.
As maven has some built in options for selecting which modules/directories to build,
would it be better to just use those options? Instead of defining profiles, it might look
something like "mvn install -pl common,ArjunaCore" instead of the build profile
"mvn install -Pcore"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira