[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=comments#action_12369579 ]
Kevin Conner commented on JBTM-217:
-----------------------------------
The easiest solution is for this to be supported directly by the transaction
implementation.
This was a possibility at the time but I can't remember the reason for not doing it.
Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-217
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: JTA Implementation
Affects Versions: 4.2.3
Reporter: Phillip Thurmond
Assigned To: Andrew Dinn
Fix For: 4.4
Time Spent: 1 day
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in
TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira