]
Tom Jenkinson commented on JBTM-1650:
-------------------------------------
Ups, it must have rolled off the end, feel free to resolve then as it was the only example
of the failure....
SIGPIPE as xatmi test tearDown() is calling tpdiscon()
------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-1650
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1650
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: BlackTie
Reporter: Amos Feng
Assignee: Amos Feng
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 5.0.0.M3
==7024==
==7024== Process terminating with default action of signal 13 (SIGPIPE)
==7024== at 0x363040E5CD: ??? (in /lib64/libpthread-2.14.90.so)
==7024== by 0x7044D56: apr_socket_send (in /usr/lib64/libapr-1.so.0.4.6)
==7024== by 0x76FF688: HybridSocketEndpointQueue::_send(char const*, long, long,
char*, int, long, long, char const*, char const*) (HybridSocketEndpointQueue.cxx:287)
==7024== by 0x76FF878: HybridSocketEndpointQueue::send(char const*, long, long, char*,
int, long, long, char const*, char const*) (HybridSocketEndpointQueue.cxx:325)
==7024== by 0x76FA50F: HybridSocketSessionImpl::send(message_t&)
(HybridSocketSessionImpl.cxx:519)
==7024== by 0x92B629D: send(Session*, char const*, char*, long, int, long, long,
message_t&, long, int, long, bool, char*) (XATMIc.cxx:147)
==7024== by 0x92B66B8: send(Session*, char const*, char*, long, int, long, long, long,
int, long, bool, char*) (XATMIc.cxx:182)
==7024== by 0x92C1051: tpdiscon (XATMIc.cxx:1219)
==7024== by 0x44416D: TestTPRecv::tearDown() (TestTPRecv.cxx:63)
==7024== by 0x445584: CppUnit::TestCaller<TestTPRecv>::tearDown()
(TestCaller.h:182)
==7024== by 0x3707A29B36: CppUnit::TestCaseMethodFunctor::operator()() const
(TestCase.cpp:32)
==7024== by 0x3707A1BEA3: CppUnit::DefaultProtector::protect(CppUnit::Functor
const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) (DefaultProtector.cpp:15)
==7024== by 0x3707A25C18: CppUnit::ProtectorChain::ProtectFunctor::operator()() const
(ProtectorChain.cpp:20)
==7024== by 0x3707A2595B: CppUnit::ProtectorChain::protect(CppUnit::Functor
const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) (ProtectorChain.cpp:77)
==7024== by 0x3707A3164F: CppUnit::TestResult::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&,
CppUnit::Test*, std::string const&) (TestResult.cpp:178)
==7024== by 0x3707A2989B: CppUnit::TestCase::run(CppUnit::TestResult*)
(TestCase.cpp:97)
==7024== by 0x3707A2A10B:
CppUnit::TestComposite::doRunChildTests(CppUnit::TestResult*) (TestComposite.cpp:64)
==7024== by 0x3707A2A035: CppUnit::TestComposite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*)
(TestComposite.cpp:23)
==7024== by 0x3707A2A10B:
CppUnit::TestComposite::doRunChildTests(CppUnit::TestResult*) (TestComposite.cpp:64)
==7024== by 0x3707A2A035: CppUnit::TestComposite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*)
(TestComposite.cpp:23)
==7024== by 0x3707A31429: CppUnit::TestResult::runTest(CppUnit::Test*)
(TestResult.cpp:145)
==7024== by 0x3707A33A21: CppUnit::TestRunner::run(CppUnit::TestResult&,
std::string const&) (TestRunner.cpp:96)
==7024== by 0x3707A369CA: CppUnit::TextTestRunner::run(std::string, bool, bool, bool)
(TextTestRunner.cpp:64)
==7024== by 0x4E2043: main (TestRunner.cxx:27)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: