[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217?page=comments#action_12369690 ]
Andrew Dinn commented on JBTM-217:
----------------------------------
Yes, that would be easy to do. However, Mark does not want the jtax layer to use any
non-standard hooks into the JTA/JTS codebase. That way the AS can maintain
interoperability with other Transaction Service implementations. So, we must only rely on
the javax.transaction API. Was that the rationale for not using the transaction
implementation last time?
Contention on SychronizedMap in TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-217
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-217
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: JTA Implementation
Affects Versions: 4.2.3
Reporter: Phillip Thurmond
Assigned To: Andrew Dinn
Fix For: 4.4
Time Spent: 1 day
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Under heavy loads, I'm seeing contention on the object map in
TransactionLocalDelegateImpl.java. Can this variable be changed to use ConcurrentHashMap?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira