I have a web service that worked fine in AS 4.2.1GA, but since porting to 5.1.0GA, I have
been unable to access it if it is secure. If I remove authMethod=BASIC setting of the
WebContext, I can access the ejb, but it is not secure.
I am using the native stack, version 3.2.0GA.
Here is my interface definition (simplified):
| @WebService
| @SOAPBinding(style = SOAPBinding.Style.RPC)
| public interface Inquiry {
|
| String echo(@WebParam(name="echoText", mode=Mode.IN) String echoText);
|
Here is my EJB3 definition:
| @WebService(endpointInterface="com.foo.Inquiry")
| @WebContext(contextRoot="check-inquiry", /* SEK TODO: not working */
authMethod="BASIC" /**/, secureWSDLAccess=false)
| @Stateless
| @SecurityDomain("my-security-domain")
| @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.SUPPORTS) //we do not require a
transaction. we do not perform any updates.
| @Interceptors({PerformanceProfiler.class, ExceptionLogger.class})
| public class InquiryImpl extends BasePersistentContextHolder implements Inquiry {
|
| @Override
| public String echo(final String echoText) {
| getLog().debug("echo=[" + echoText+ "]");
| return echoText;
| }
|
Here is my jax-rpc client code:
| private Inquiry getService(final String username, final String password, final
boolean withAuth) throws MalformedURLException, ServiceException {
| Stub stub = (Stub) new InquiryService_Impl().getInquiryPort();
| stub._setProperty(javax.xml.rpc.Stub.ENDPOINT_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
"http://localhost:8080/check-inquiry/InquiryImpl?wsdl");
|
|
| if (withAuth) {
| stub._setProperty(javax.xml.rpc.Stub.USERNAME_PROPERTY, username);
| stub._setProperty(javax.xml.rpc.Stub.PASSWORD_PROPERTY, password);
| }
|
| return (Inquiry) stub;
| }
|
Let's see, I've got the custom security domain configured in
conf/login-config.xml. I've read through the documentation and tried a number of
things with other configuration files, like jboss-wsse-server.xml in META-INF. Nothing
has worked. I am deploying as an ejb-jar file inside of an ear file.
I'm hoping that someone can see some inconsistency in this all that I have missed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256905#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...