November 2006 - jbossws-users - Jboss List Archives

[JBossWS] - Re: Is Jbossws rpc Call impl Threadsafe ?

by vberetti

I found where the problem is comming from. My 20 threads were using the same Call instance. When I create 1 call instance for each thread there is no problem. Is javax.xml.rpc.Call implementation in Jbossws 1.0.3.GA threasafe ? Vincent. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984472#3984472 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984472

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Document/Literal enpoint & MTOM/XOP attachments

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Thanks alessio. I few things already changed in 1.0.4. See the comments in your blog. Regarding the example: That would have been a great contribution, but i already changed the mtom samples to doc/lit a while ago: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossws/branches/jbossws-1.0/src/test/java... http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossws/branches/jbossws-1.0/src/test/reso... Still if you think this does not suffice, i'd happily update the samples accordingly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984450#3984450 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984450

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Error in WSDL with complex type (EJB3 WebService)

by martinwhs

Hello, I use EJB3-annotated Webservices in JBoss 4.0.4 GA. This worked fine, even with rather complex types, up until now. I have an Interface | public interface EntityAware<E> { | | /** | * @return an entity of type E | * @throws EntityConversionException | */ | E getEntity() throws EntityConversionException; | | } | which I want my DTOs to implement. Like this: | | public class PersonInfo implements EntityAware<Person> { | | ... | | public Person getEntity() throws EntityConversionException { | // TODO Auto-generated method stub | return null; | } | | } | | If then, such a DTO (implementing the interface) is used as a type in my Webservice, the WSDL gets very complex. It would then include all affected namespaces in the java class hierachy down to java.lang.Class. Example: | ... | <import namespace="http://reflect.lang.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" /> | <import namespace="http://cert.security.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://annotation.lang.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://lang.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://services.ws.foo.bar.com/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://net.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://security.java/jaws" /> | <import namespace="http://util.java/jaws" /> | ... | Is this a desired behaviour? To my understanding a DTO should be able to implement any kind of interface without the datatypes of that very interface having any kind of impact on the schema-representation of the DTO in the WSDL. Is there a way to change that behaviour by configuration or do I need a newer version of jbossws? Best regards and many thanks, Martin Hesse View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984433#3984433 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984433

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: @SecurityDomain must be used?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-1339 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984387#3984387 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984387

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Incomplete Deployment Listing Error in JBoss 4.0.4

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Generally, you should remove any services that are not needed so they want consume resources. Is there any relevant stack trace for me to look at? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984381#3984381 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984381

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Document/Literal enpoint & MTOM/XOP attachments

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Thanks Alessio, I'll give this to our MTOM folks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984380#3984380 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984380

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: JBossWS Stack and Polymorphic SEI

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

This is a tools issue, that is not implemented. Please create a jira feature request that links to this form post and tell your friends to vote for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984379#3984379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984379

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: jbossws-1.0.3.GA released

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Please do not hijack Heiko's announcement post. Instead start new threads that deal with your specific issues. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984377#3984377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984377

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: JSR 181-document style-DII not working

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Call.setReturnType(QName) If this does not work for you, please create a jira issue and a small test case View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984376#3984376 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984376

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Passing complex EJB to WS

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Please rethink your design. Webservices is about the exchange of comples business documents defined by xml schema. An entity bean is an implementation detail of some persistence aspect. BTW, XML schema can only express object trees - no graphs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3984373#3984373 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3984373

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-users November 2006