"kukeltje" wrote : Btw, your processdefinition is illegal... not all legs of the
fork arrive in the same corresponding join. There should be an additional fork after the
fork but before B and C)and an additional join after F and G but before the join.... You
cannot partially nest things....
Yes, I noticed that because after fixing the error, the process runs and finishes but node
E never gets executed. I think that may be a bug in the system. H should not be executed
if it is dependent on E which has not executed. Is this a bug?
I have fixed my process to do the right thing. Thanks kukeltje
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197499#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...