hhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmm............. Martin, you are great. Your memory works better than mine ;-) So it was no deja-vu, but a real memory.... Jan, so it is a regression. Could you try and the flush to the join node, (re) compile jbpm (or that one class) and test? | Index: modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java | =================================================================== | --- modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java (revision 3339) | +++ modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java (working copy) | @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@ | // force version increment by default (LockMode.FORCE) | LockMode lockMode = parentLockMode != null ? LockMode.parse(parentLockMode) : LockMode.FORCE; | log.debug("acquiring " + lockMode + " lock on " + parentToken); | - // lock updates as appropriate, no need to flush here | + // Required for Oracle, see https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1085 | + session.flush(); | + // lock updates as appropriate | session.lock(parentToken, lockMode); | } | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196531#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...