Re: [rules-users] ruleflow trouble when process a large number of records

There should be no tweaking to get it working correctly (ruleflows don't even use separate threads during execution currently). Based on your explanation however, it is not obvious why things might be going wrong. I suggest trying to use the audit view or a custom logger to figure out what is going on in both cases. If you are losing records, there must be some reason why the rules are not being executed for those records (e.g. the record does not match the conditions of the rule, the ruleflow-group is deactivated before all records have been processed, etc.). Try making a small use case where you enter a number of records and not all records seem to be processed. Then try looking at the audit log to see which rules are activated and deactivated, which ruleflow-groups are activated and deactivated, etc. If you do find a problem where you thing the ruleflow is not behaving as expected, it would be nice if you could send me a self-countained example that shows the problem and I'll try to look into it asap. One additional piece of advice: it does seem a little strange however that you are using 50 ruleflow-groups for 116 rules. Ruleflow-groups are used to specify the order in which large rule sets should be executed. If you want to specify the order for single rules, other features like salience, agenda groups, etc. might also be useful. But nevertheless, ruleflows should even work in these circumstances. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mazrim" <UE011434(a)guest.telecomitalia.it&gt; To: <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Subject: [rules-users] ruleflow trouble when process a large number of records