Hmmm, that could be it!
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that "guard" object. Would that
mean that I should insert some dummy object in a script node (action node)
before my rule node and change its value inside this rule, so the rule could
be triggered when the second and third instance of sub-process reach it?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-sub-process-rules-inside-m...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.