Re: [rules-users] Template bug on "package" keyword
I believe I tried this and having multiple package statements - even for the
same package - in a file generates a different error.
However, the example does list the package as optional - which if it were
would also work. Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Template-bug-on-packa...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.