Re: [rules-users] ruleflow-group vs. agenda-group vs. activation-group ?
On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:16, Péter Gergely, Horváth <h.peter(a)mailbox.hu> wrote:
Hi All,
I've been experimenting with agenda-group and ruleflow-group features and I am now a
bit confused. The documentation states that agenda-group and ruleflow-group features have
been merged, but I'm not sure how this relates to activation groups.
it doesn’t.
That is a separate thing, and unchanged.
ruleflow-groups used to be a rule-flow feature, driven by the .RF file, requiring JBPM
engine behind the scenes. Agenda-group work without the presence of JBPM: does it mean we
can use the RF file for visualizing the agenda-groups as well?
All it means is
that the rule flow now calls setFocus() when it reaches a ruleflow-group.
Could someone please shed some light on the differences between these constructs? Which
one is the currently recommended approach (when?) for controlling rule execution flow?
So an ruleflow-group and an agenda-group are now the same thing. RuleFlow is an
additional thing to orchestrate the calling of the ruleflow/agenda-group.
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users