10:15 a.m.
Hi,
We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process events coming
from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about the state
of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces the
correct results.
However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the system runs
for extended periods of time until we start getting OutOfMemoryExceptions
and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact that the
fact count reported by
the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/)
against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
reports more and more instances
of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one instance of
java.lang.Object[]
To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours in
total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000 events
from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet in the
heap dump we see 829 632 instances of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with my rules
that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I should do
to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
Thanks,
Werner Stoop
8:10 a.m.
Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you don't
call with a limit for rule firings.)
Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to one or
more of your rules.
Are you using timers? How?
A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
-W
On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process events coming
from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about the state
of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces the
correct results.
However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the system runs
for extended periods of time until we start getting OutOfMemoryExceptions
and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact that the
fact count reported by
the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/)
against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
reports more and more instances
of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one instance of
java.lang.Object[]
To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours in
total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000 events
from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet in the
heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with my rules
that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I should do
to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
Thanks,
Werner Stoop
8:37 a.m.
Hi, thank you for your response.
We use Drools 5.3.1 through Maven. When I invoke Drools, for each event I
receive I do the following:
ksession.insert(obj);
ksession.fireAllRules();
where ksession was previously created through
kbase = KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBase();
kbase.addKnowledgePackages(kbuilder.getKnowledgePackages());
ksession = kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
Yes, we do use timers. In one case we want to remove alarms that have been
cleared for more than an hour from the knowledgebase. We don't remove them
immediately because some alarms clear briefly and then come back. The rule
I've written to handle this situation is the following:
rule "Old Cleared Alarm?"
timer(int: 10m 10m)
salience -10
when
$a : Alarm(severity == "cleared")
then
double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
if(lastUpdate > 60) {
logger.debug("Alarm " + $a.getAlarmId() + " is old. Removing...");
retract($a);
}
end
Is there any other way to write this? I've found that I can't put the
minutesSince($a.getEventTime()) in the rule's when-clause.
Thank you,
Werner
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you
don't
call with a limit for rule firings.)
Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to one or
more of your rules.
Are you using timers? How?
A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
-W
On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process events
coming
> from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about the
state
> of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
> database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces the
> correct results.
>
> However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the system
runs
> for extended periods of time until we start getting OutOfMemoryExceptions
> and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact that the
> fact count reported by
> the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
> with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
>
> I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
)
> against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
> reports more and more instances
> of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one instance of
> java.lang.Object[]
>
> To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours in
> total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000 events
> from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet in
the
> heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
> org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
>
> What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with my
rules
> that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I should
do
> to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
>
> Thanks,
> Werner Stoop
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
9:35 a.m.
On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, thank you for your response.
We use Drools 5.3.1 through Maven. When I invoke Drools, for each event I
receive I do the following:
ksession.insert(obj);
ksession.fireAllRules();
This is OK.
Yes, we do use timers. In one case we want to remove alarms that have been
cleared for more than an hour from the knowledgebase. We don't remove them
immediately because some alarms clear briefly and then come back. The rule
I've written to handle this situation is the following:
rule "Old Cleared Alarm?"
timer(int: 10m 10m)
salience -10
when
$a : Alarm(severity == "cleared")
then
double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
if(lastUpdate > 60) {
logger.debug("Alarm " + $a.getAlarmId() + " is old. Removing...");
retract($a);
}
end
Is there any other way to write this? I've found that I can't put the
minutesSince($a.getEventTime()) in the rule's when-clause.
It's fine as you have it; it would not be evaluated correctly on the LHS.
But considering 2000000 events, if they were all Alarm, you'd have a
rate of 17800 events/hour, and so you'd have that many scheduled
agenda items.
What about the other timer rules for other Event types? Are there
similar scenarios?
-W
Thank you,
Werner
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Laun
<wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you don't
> call with a limit for rule firings.)
>
> Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to one or
> more of your rules.
>
> Are you using timers? How?
>
> A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
> ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
> unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
>
> -W
>
> On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process events
> coming
> > from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about the
> state
> > of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
> > database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces the
> > correct results.
> >
> > However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the system
> runs
> > for extended periods of time until we start getting
> > OutOfMemoryExceptions
> > and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact that
> > the
> > fact count reported by
> > the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
> > with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
> >
> > I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool
> > (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
> )
> > against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
> > reports more and more instances
> > of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one instance
> > of
> > java.lang.Object[]
> >
> > To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours in
> > total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000
> > events
> > from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet in
> the
> > heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
> > org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
> >
> > What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with my
> rules
> > that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I should
> do
> > to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Werner Stoop
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
10:22 a.m.
Thanks Wolfgang,
Yes, we do have a lot of events/hour, because it is a complex network we're
monitoring. Our system has been running for some time, but the Drools rules
engine is a new addition to attempt to manage some of the complexity.
Perhaps I should clarify events and alarms: Our main system tracks alarms
within the network, but each alarm may have several events, like an event
when the alarm is first raised, an event when its status goes from major to
critical and an event when the alarm is cleared. So the main entity in our
rules is an Alarm, and whenever we get an event we insert a new Alarm into
the knowledge base if we've never seen the Alarm before, or update the
Alarm if we have.
We have one other rule that removes all Alarms whose status haven't changed
for 24 hours, regardless of whether they have cleared or not. This rule's
syntax is very similar to the one from my previous email. We specifically
have this rule to try and keep the fact count in the rules engine
manageable.
rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?"
timer(int: 30m 30m)
salience -10
when
$a : Alarm(severity != "cleared")
then
double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
if(lastUpdate > 24 * 60) {
retract($a);
}
end
So what you said would explain the memory usage. All Alarms end up in "Old,
Inactive Alarm?"'s queue waiting for 24 hours.
I'm going to disable this rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?" for the time being.
Unfortunately the nature of the problem means that I'll have to monitor it
for a day or two before I can draw any conclusions.
It seems that the proper solution to this problem would be to get more
memory.
Thank you,
Werner
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, thank you for your response.
>
> We use Drools 5.3.1 through Maven. When I invoke Drools, for each event I
> receive I do the following:
>
> ksession.insert(obj);
> ksession.fireAllRules();
>
This is OK.
>
> Yes, we do use timers. In one case we want to remove alarms that have
been
> cleared for more than an hour from the knowledgebase. We don't remove
them
> immediately because some alarms clear briefly and then come back. The
rule
> I've written to handle this situation is the following:
>
> rule "Old Cleared Alarm?"
> timer(int: 10m 10m)
> salience -10
> when
> $a : Alarm(severity == "cleared")
> then
> double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
> if(lastUpdate > 60) {
> logger.debug("Alarm " + $a.getAlarmId() + " is old.
Removing...");
> retract($a);
> }
> end
>
> Is there any other way to write this? I've found that I can't put the
> minutesSince($a.getEventTime()) in the rule's when-clause.
It's fine as you have it; it would not be evaluated correctly on the LHS.
But considering 2000000 events, if they were all Alarm, you'd have a
rate of 17800 events/hour, and so you'd have that many scheduled
agenda items.
What about the other timer rules for other Event types? Are there
similar scenarios?
-W
>
> Thank you,
> Werner
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Laun
> <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you don't
>> call with a limit for rule firings.)
>>
>> Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to one or
>> more of your rules.
>>
>> Are you using timers? How?
>>
>> A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
>> ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
>> unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
>>
>> -W
>>
>> On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process events
>> coming
>> > from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about the
>> state
>> > of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
>> > database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces
the
>> > correct results.
>> >
>> > However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the system
>> runs
>> > for extended periods of time until we start getting
>> > OutOfMemoryExceptions
>> > and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact that
>> > the
>> > fact count reported by
>> > the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
>> > with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
>> >
>> > I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool
>> > (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
>> )
>> > against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
>> > reports more and more instances
>> > of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one instance
>> > of
>> > java.lang.Object[]
>> >
>> > To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours
in
>> > total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000
>> > events
>> > from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet in
>> the
>> > heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
>> > org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
>> >
>> > What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with my
>> rules
>> > that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I
should
>> do
>> > to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Werner Stoop
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12:21 p.m.
For this kind of clean-up (to get rid of events that have been around
for 24h plus) you can insert a single event, let's call it EveryHour,
and write a rule with a timer, to fire timer(int: 1h 1h). (If this is
too coarse, use 15m 15 or whatever.) On the RHS, run a query to select
all that you want to discard, and discard. The current time - 24h
would have to be a parameter to the query.
This should reduce the number of scheduled activations, at the cost of
running the query; this depends on the number of Alarm events in the
system.
Other techniques I can think of might require some additional
bookkeeping, so as to have all uncleared Alarms in some Collection.
This could be tricky, depending on the number of state transitions,
etc.
-W
On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Wolfgang,
Yes, we do have a lot of events/hour, because it is a complex network we're
monitoring. Our system has been running for some time, but the Drools rules
engine is a new addition to attempt to manage some of the complexity.
Perhaps I should clarify events and alarms: Our main system tracks alarms
within the network, but each alarm may have several events, like an event
when the alarm is first raised, an event when its status goes from major to
critical and an event when the alarm is cleared. So the main entity in our
rules is an Alarm, and whenever we get an event we insert a new Alarm into
the knowledge base if we've never seen the Alarm before, or update the
Alarm if we have.
We have one other rule that removes all Alarms whose status haven't changed
for 24 hours, regardless of whether they have cleared or not. This rule's
syntax is very similar to the one from my previous email. We specifically
have this rule to try and keep the fact count in the rules engine
manageable.
rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?"
timer(int: 30m 30m)
salience -10
when
$a : Alarm(severity != "cleared")
then
double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
if(lastUpdate > 24 * 60) {
retract($a);
}
end
So what you said would explain the memory usage. All Alarms end up in "Old,
Inactive Alarm?"'s queue waiting for 24 hours.
I'm going to disable this rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?" for the time being.
Unfortunately the nature of the problem means that I'll have to monitor it
for a day or two before I can draw any conclusions.
It seems that the proper solution to this problem would be to get more
memory.
Thank you,
Werner
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Wolfgang Laun
<wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, thank you for your response.
> >
> > We use Drools 5.3.1 through Maven. When I invoke Drools, for each event
> > I
> > receive I do the following:
> >
> > ksession.insert(obj);
> > ksession.fireAllRules();
> >
> This is OK.
>
> >
> > Yes, we do use timers. In one case we want to remove alarms that have
> been
> > cleared for more than an hour from the knowledgebase. We don't remove
> them
> > immediately because some alarms clear briefly and then come back. The
> rule
> > I've written to handle this situation is the following:
> >
> > rule "Old Cleared Alarm?"
> > timer(int: 10m 10m)
> > salience -10
> > when
> > $a : Alarm(severity == "cleared")
> > then
> > double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
> > if(lastUpdate > 60) {
> > logger.debug("Alarm " + $a.getAlarmId() + " is old.
Removing...");
> > retract($a);
> > }
> > end
> >
> > Is there any other way to write this? I've found that I can't put the
> > minutesSince($a.getEventTime()) in the rule's when-clause.
>
> It's fine as you have it; it would not be evaluated correctly on the LHS.
>
> But considering 2000000 events, if they were all Alarm, you'd have a
> rate of 17800 events/hour, and so you'd have that many scheduled
> agenda items.
>
> What about the other timer rules for other Event types? Are there
> similar scenarios?
>
> -W
>
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Werner
> >
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Laun
> > <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you don't
> >> call with a limit for rule firings.)
> >>
> >> Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to one
or
> >> more of your rules.
> >>
> >> Are you using timers? How?
> >>
> >> A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
> >> ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
> >> unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
> >>
> >> -W
> >>
> >> On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process
events
> >> coming
> >> > from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about
> >> > the
> >> state
> >> > of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
> >> > database. All our rules work as we expected and the system produces
> the
> >> > correct results.
> >> >
> >> > However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the
> >> > system
> >> runs
> >> > for extended periods of time until we start getting
> >> > OutOfMemoryExceptions
> >> > and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact
> >> > that
> >> > the
> >> > fact count reported by
> >> > the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably stable,
> >> > with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
> >> >
> >> > I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool
> >> > (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
> >> )
> >> > against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time it
> >> > reports more and more instances
> >> > of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one
> >> > instance
> >> > of
> >> > java.lang.Object[]
> >> >
> >> > To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112 hours
> in
> >> > total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000 000
> >> > events
> >> > from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session, yet
> >> > in
> >> the
> >> > heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
> >> > org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
> >> >
> >> > What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong with
> >> > my
> >> rules
> >> > that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I
> should
> >> do
> >> > to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Werner Stoop
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
2:26 p.m.
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you for your help. This sounds like a much better idea than what I
have at the moment.
I'll have to read up on queries in Drools first, though, because I've never
used them before.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
For this kind of clean-up (to get rid of events that have been
around
for 24h plus) you can insert a single event, let's call it EveryHour,
and write a rule with a timer, to fire timer(int: 1h 1h). (If this is
too coarse, use 15m 15 or whatever.) On the RHS, run a query to select
all that you want to discard, and discard. The current time - 24h
would have to be a parameter to the query.
This should reduce the number of scheduled activations, at the cost of
running the query; this depends on the number of Alarm events in the
system.
Other techniques I can think of might require some additional
bookkeeping, so as to have all uncleared Alarms in some Collection.
This could be tricky, depending on the number of state transitions,
etc.
-W
On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Wolfgang,
>
> Yes, we do have a lot of events/hour, because it is a complex network
we're
> monitoring. Our system has been running for some time, but the Drools
rules
> engine is a new addition to attempt to manage some of the complexity.
>
> Perhaps I should clarify events and alarms: Our main system tracks alarms
> within the network, but each alarm may have several events, like an event
> when the alarm is first raised, an event when its status goes from major
to
> critical and an event when the alarm is cleared. So the main entity in
our
> rules is an Alarm, and whenever we get an event we insert a new Alarm
into
> the knowledge base if we've never seen the Alarm before, or update the
> Alarm if we have.
>
> We have one other rule that removes all Alarms whose status haven't
changed
> for 24 hours, regardless of whether they have cleared or not. This rule's
> syntax is very similar to the one from my previous email. We specifically
> have this rule to try and keep the fact count in the rules engine
> manageable.
>
> rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?"
> timer(int: 30m 30m)
> salience -10
> when
> $a : Alarm(severity != "cleared")
> then
> double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
> if(lastUpdate > 24 * 60) {
> retract($a);
> }
> end
>
> So what you said would explain the memory usage. All Alarms end up in
"Old,
> Inactive Alarm?"'s queue waiting for 24 hours.
>
> I'm going to disable this rule "Old, Inactive Alarm?" for the time
being.
> Unfortunately the nature of the problem means that I'll have to monitor
it
> for a day or two before I can draw any conclusions.
>
> It seems that the proper solution to this problem would be to get more
> memory.
>
> Thank you,
> Werner
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Wolfgang Laun
> <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 29/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi, thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > We use Drools 5.3.1 through Maven. When I invoke Drools, for each
event
>> > I
>> > receive I do the following:
>> >
>> > ksession.insert(obj);
>> > ksession.fireAllRules();
>> >
>> This is OK.
>>
>> >
>> > Yes, we do use timers. In one case we want to remove alarms that have
>> been
>> > cleared for more than an hour from the knowledgebase. We don't remove
>> them
>> > immediately because some alarms clear briefly and then come back. The
>> rule
>> > I've written to handle this situation is the following:
>> >
>> > rule "Old Cleared Alarm?"
>> > timer(int: 10m 10m)
>> > salience -10
>> > when
>> > $a : Alarm(severity == "cleared")
>> > then
>> > double lastUpdate = minutesSince($a.getEventTime());
>> > if(lastUpdate > 60) {
>> > logger.debug("Alarm " + $a.getAlarmId() + " is old.
Removing...");
>> > retract($a);
>> > }
>> > end
>> >
>> > Is there any other way to write this? I've found that I can't put
the
>> > minutesSince($a.getEventTime()) in the rule's when-clause.
>>
>> It's fine as you have it; it would not be evaluated correctly on the
LHS.
>>
>> But considering 2000000 events, if they were all Alarm, you'd have a
>> rate of 17800 events/hour, and so you'd have that many scheduled
>> agenda items.
>>
>> What about the other timer rules for other Event types? Are there
>> similar scenarios?
>>
>> -W
>>
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Werner
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Wolfgang Laun
>> > <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Just to make sure: How do you invoke the Engine? (I suppose you
don't
>> >> call with a limit for rule firings.)
>> >>
>> >> Unless it's a bug (BTW: your Drools version is?), it's due to
one or
>> >> more of your rules.
>> >>
>> >> Are you using timers? How?
>> >>
>> >> A detailed investigation of the whereabouts of these
>> >> ScheduledAgendaItem objects might be done by investigating (via the
>> >> unstable API) the Agenda and its various components.
>> >>
>> >> -W
>> >>
>> >> On 28/05/2012, Werner Stoop <wstoop(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > We're using Drools with a StatefulKnowledgeSession to process
events
>> >> coming
>> >> > from equipment in our network. The system draws conclusions about
>> >> > the
>> >> state
>> >> > of the equipment and writes those conclusions to a table in our
>> >> > database. All our rules work as we expected and the system
produces
>> the
>> >> > correct results.
>> >> >
>> >> > However, the memory usage of the JVM steadily goes up when the
>> >> > system
>> >> runs
>> >> > for extended periods of time until we start getting
>> >> > OutOfMemoryExceptions
>> >> > and the server has to be restarted. This is in spite of the fact
>> >> > that
>> >> > the
>> >> > fact count reported by
>> >> > the StatefulKnowledgeSession.getFactCount() stays reasonably
stable,
>> >> > with around 30 000 facts (give or take) at any point in time.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have run the Eclipse Memory Analyzer tool
>> >> > (http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
>> >> )
>> >> > against heap dumps from the JVM several times now, and every time
it
>> >> > reports more and more instances
>> >> > of org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem referenced from one
>> >> > instance
>> >> > of
>> >> > java.lang.Object[]
>> >> >
>> >> > To be concrete, since this morning the uptime is more than 112
hours
>> in
>> >> > total, during which the system has processed little over 2 000
000
>> >> > events
>> >> > from the network. It has 29 000 facts in the knowledge session,
yet
>> >> > in
>> >> the
>> >> > heap dump we see 829 632 instances of
>> >> > org.drools.common.ScheduledAgendaItem.
>> >> >
>> >> > What is the ScheduledAgendaItem for? Is there something wrong
with
>> >> > my
>> >> rules
>> >> > that causes this many instances to be held? Is there something I
>> should
>> >> do
>> >> > to release these instances or the Object[] holding on to them?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Werner Stoop
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4407
days inactive
4408
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Werner Stoop -
Wolfgang Laun