9:29 p.m.
Hello All,
I am looking to organize the rules in different categories. But for
distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
roles/processing phases
So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it can belong to
multiple categories
So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub categories
witin them
We have rules which will device the category of the item
Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather
rule"
Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I define the rule
in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it in Pant package.. Will
have to redefine it.
The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule in Shirt
package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then I will
have to
put it in both categories
When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
on "XL
Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it be an "and"
relationship or will be an "OR"
Regards,
Amit
9:05 p.m.
A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an asset among
different packages. It also creates a global area (you can consider it
as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset that you
think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from your
current package to the global area, so that this global asset can be
reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk, maybe you
want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
appreciated.
Cheers,
Jervis
Amit Kumar wrote:
Hello All,
I am looking to organize the rules in different categories. But for
distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
roles/processing phases
So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it can belong
to multiple categories
So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
categories witin them
We have rules which will device the category of the item
Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather
rule"
Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I define the
rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it in Pant
package.. Will have to redefine it.
The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule in Shirt
package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then I will
have to put it in both categories
When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
on "XL
Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it be an "and"
relationship or will be an "OR"
Regards,
Amit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
9:54 a.m.
Thanks Jervis!!
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com> wrote:
A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
will be
available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an asset among
different packages. It also creates a global area (you can consider it
as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset that you
think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from your
current package to the global area, so that this global asset can be
reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk, maybe you
want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
appreciated.
Cheers,
Jervis
Amit Kumar wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am looking to organize the rules in different categories. But for
> distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> roles/processing phases
>
> So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it can belong
> to multiple categories
>
> So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
> categories witin them
>
> We have rules which will device the category of the item
> Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather
rule"
>
> Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I define the
> rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it in Pant
> package.. Will have to redefine it.
>
> The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule in Shirt
> package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then I
will
> have to put it in both categories
> When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL
Rule" on "XL
> Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it be an
"and"
> relationship or will be an "OR"
>
> Regards,
> Amit
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12:04 a.m.
The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
They do seem rich in features .. especially support for collect/accumulate
in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not all of
them.
I am picking it from here
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
Any other place I can look :)
Thanks
Amit
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jervis!!
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an asset among
> different packages. It also creates a global area (you can consider it
> as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset that you
> think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from your
> current package to the global area, so that this global asset can be
> reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk, maybe you
> want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories. But for
> > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> > roles/processing phases
> >
> > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it can belong
> > to multiple categories
> >
> > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
> > categories witin them
> >
> > We have rules which will device the category of the item
> > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule",
leather rule"
> >
> > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I define the
> > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it in Pant
> > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> >
> > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule in Shirt
> > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then
I will
> > have to put it in both categories
> > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL
Rule" on "XL
> > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it be an
"and"
> > relationship or will be an "OR"
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
4:28 a.m.
Hi,
Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
what your model looks like?
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
all of them.
I am picking it from here
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
Any other place I can look :)
Thanks
Amit
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
<mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks Jervis!!
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
asset among
different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
consider it
as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
that you
think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
your
current package to the global area, so that this global asset
can be
reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
maybe you
want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
appreciated.
Cheers,
Jervis
Amit Kumar wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
But for
> distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> roles/processing phases
>
> So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
can belong
> to multiple categories
>
> So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
> categories witin them
>
> We have rules which will device the category of the item
> Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule",
leather rule"
>
> Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
define the
> rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
in Pant
> package.. Will have to redefine it.
>
> The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
in Shirt
> package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size"
then
I will
> have to put it in both categories
> When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and
"XL Rule"
on "XL
> Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
be an "and"
> relationship or will be an "OR"
>
> Regards,
> Amit
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
10:20 a.m.
Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
what your model looks like?
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
> The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
> collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>
> But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
> attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
> all of them.
> I am picking it from here
>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
> Any other place I can look :)
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jervis!!
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will
be
> available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
> asset among
> different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
> consider it
> as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
> that you
> think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
> your
> current package to the global area, so that this global asset
> can be
> reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
> maybe you
> want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
> But for
> > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> > roles/processing phases
> >
> > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
> can belong
> > to multiple categories
> >
> > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
> > categories witin them
> >
> > We have rules which will device the category of the item
> > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth
rule", leather rule"
> >
> > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
> define the
> > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
> in Pant
> > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> >
> > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
> in Shirt
> > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL
Size" then
> I will
> > have to put it in both categories
> > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and
"XL Rule"
> on "XL
> > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
> be an "and"
> > relationship or will be an "OR"
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
11:17 a.m.
Its coming from a JAR
Thanks
Amit
Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer String
owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType String OSVersion
String imageName String EquipmentCA extends Equipment hostname
String productName String productFamily String productId String
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative
Model?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
> what your model looks like?
>
> Toni
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
> >
> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
> > all of them.
> > I am picking it from here
> >
>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
> > Any other place I can look :)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jervis!!
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
will
> be
> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
> > asset among
> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
> > consider it
> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
> > that you
> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
> > your
> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset
> > can be
> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
> > maybe you
> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jervis
> >
> >
> > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
> > But for
> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> > > roles/processing phases
> > >
> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
> > can belong
> > > to multiple categories
> > >
> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have
> sub
> > > categories witin them
> > >
> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item
> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth
rule", leather rule"
> > >
> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
> > define the
> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
> > in Pant
> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> > >
> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
> > in Shirt
> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL
Size" then
> > I will
> > > have to put it in both categories
> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category"
and "XL Rule"
> > on "XL
> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
> > be an "and"
> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Amit
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:31 a.m.
And let me guess... The fields you are not seeing are those from Equipment
when you have an EquipmentCA?
2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
Its coming from a JAR
Thanks
Amit
Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer
String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType
String OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends
Equipment hostname String productName String productFamily
String productId String
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
>> what your model looks like?
>>
>> Toni
>>
>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>> >
>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
>> > all of them.
>> > I am picking it from here
>> >
>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>> > Any other place I can look :)
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
will
>> be
>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>> > asset among
>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>> > consider it
>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>> > that you
>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
>> > your
>> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset
>> > can be
>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>> > maybe you
>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jervis
>> >
>> >
>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > > Hello All,
>> > >
>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
>> > But for
>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
>> > > roles/processing phases
>> > >
>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>> > can belong
>> > > to multiple categories
>> > >
>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have
>> sub
>> > > categories witin them
>> > >
>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth
rule", leather rule"
>> > >
>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
>> > define the
>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>> > in Pant
>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>> > >
>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
>> > in Shirt
>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL
Size" then
>> > I will
>> > > have to put it in both categories
>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue
Category" and "XL Rule"
>> > on "XL
>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will
it
>> > be an "and"
>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Amit
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > rules-users mailing list
>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
11:32 a.m.
Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to
lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
Thanks
Amit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Its coming from a JAR
Thanks
Amit
Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer String
owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType String
OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends Equipment
hostname String productName String productFamily String productId
String
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
>> what your model looks like?
>>
>> Toni
>>
>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>> >
>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
>> > all of them.
>> > I am picking it from here
>> >
>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>> > Any other place I can look :)
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts"
will
>> be
>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>> > asset among
>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>> > consider it
>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>> > that you
>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
>> > your
>> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset
>> > can be
>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>> > maybe you
>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jervis
>> >
>> >
>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > > Hello All,
>> > >
>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
>> > But for
>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
>> > > roles/processing phases
>> > >
>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>> > can belong
>> > > to multiple categories
>> > >
>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have
>> sub
>> > > categories witin them
>> > >
>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth
rule", leather rule"
>> > >
>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
>> > define the
>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>> > in Pant
>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>> > >
>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
>> > in Shirt
>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL
Size" then
>> > I will
>> > > have to put it in both categories
>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue
Category" and "XL Rule"
>> > on "XL
>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will
it
>> > be an "and"
>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Amit
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > rules-users mailing list
>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
11:46 a.m.
But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert
to
lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
Thanks
Amit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Its coming from a JAR
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer
> String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType String
> OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends Equipment
> hostname String productName String productFamily String
> productId String
> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
>
> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
>>> what your model looks like?
>>>
>>> Toni
>>>
>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>>> >
>>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not
>>> > all of them.
>>> > I am picking it from here
>>> >
>>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>>> > Any other place I can look :)
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global
artifacts"
>>> will be
>>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>>> > asset among
>>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>>> > consider it
>>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>>> > that you
>>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
>>> > your
>>> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset
>>> > can be
>>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>>> > maybe you
>>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be
>>> highly
>>> > appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Jervis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > > Hello All,
>>> > >
>>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different
categories.
>>> > But for
>>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for
different
>>> > > roles/processing phases
>>> > >
>>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
>>> > can belong
>>> > > to multiple categories
>>> > >
>>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those
have
>>> sub
>>> > > categories witin them
>>> > >
>>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item
>>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
"cloth rule", leather rule"
>>> > >
>>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if
I
>>> > define the
>>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
>>> > in Pant
>>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>> > >
>>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price
rule
>>> > in Shirt
>>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and
"XL Size" then
>>> > I will
>>> > > have to put it in both categories
>>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue
Category" and "XL Rule"
>>> > on "XL
>>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories..
will it
>>> > be an "and"
>>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Amit
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
3:58 p.m.
Ok I tried again. :(
In Equipment I only see manufacturer
In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
In Software I do not see anything.
It contains many more classes
Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my model files
to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post it on alias
Thanks
Amit
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to
> lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Its coming from a JAR
>> Thanks
>> Amit
>>
>> Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer
>> String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType
>> String OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends
>> Equipment hostname String productName String productFamily
>> String productId String
>> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
<trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me
>>>> what your model looks like?
>>>>
>>>> Toni
>>>>
>>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>>>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>>>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages.
>>>> >
>>>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the
>>>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come..
not
>>>> > all of them.
>>>> > I am picking it from here
>>>> >
>>>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>>>> > Any other place I can look :)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Amit
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>>>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global
artifacts"
>>>> will be
>>>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
>>>> > asset among
>>>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
>>>> > consider it
>>>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
>>>> > that you
>>>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope
>>>> from
>>>> > your
>>>> > current package to the global area, so that this global
asset
>>>> > can be
>>>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
>>>> > maybe you
>>>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be
>>>> highly
>>>> > appreciated.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Jervis
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>> > > Hello All,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different
categories.
>>>> > But for
>>>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for
>>>> different
>>>> > > roles/processing phases
>>>> > >
>>>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation
it
>>>> > can belong
>>>> > > to multiple categories
>>>> > >
>>>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those
have
>>>> sub
>>>> > > categories witin them
>>>> > >
>>>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the
item
>>>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
"cloth rule", leather rule"
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is
if I
>>>> > define the
>>>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use
it
>>>> > in Pant
>>>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a
price
>>>> rule
>>>> > in Shirt
>>>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and
"XL Size" then
>>>> > I will
>>>> > > have to put it in both categories
>>>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue
Category" and "XL Rule"
>>>> > on "XL
>>>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories..
will it
>>>> > be an "and"
>>>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > > Amit
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>
>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6:02 p.m.
Sorry for spamming today
It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All of
the
following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is there..
But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it permits me
to assign a variable to it
like Equipment(eId : entityId)
but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability in
the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
Thanks,
Amit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ok I tried again. :(
In Equipment I only see manufacturer
In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
In Software I do not see anything.
It contains many more classes
Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my model files
to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post it on alias
Thanks
Amit
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
> But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>
> 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
>
> Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to
>> lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0
>> Thanks
>> Amit
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Its coming from a JAR
>>> Thanks
>>> Amit
>>>
>>> Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer
>>> String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType
>>> String OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends
>>> Equipment hostname String productName String productFamily
>>> String productId String
>>> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
<trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell
>>>>> me
>>>>> what your model looks like?
>>>>>
>>>>> Toni
>>>>>
>>>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>>>>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for
>>>>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global
packages.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all
the
>>>>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come..
not
>>>>> > all of them.
>>>>> > I am picking it from here
>>>>> >
>>>>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>>>>> > Any other place I can look :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>> > Amit
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
<amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>>>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks Jervis!!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu
<jliu(a)redhat.com
>>>>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global
artifacts"
>>>>> will be
>>>>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share
an
>>>>> > asset among
>>>>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you
can
>>>>> > consider it
>>>>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an
asset
>>>>> > that you
>>>>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global
scope
>>>>> from
>>>>> > your
>>>>> > current package to the global area, so that this global
>>>>> asset
>>>>> > can be
>>>>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on
trunk,
>>>>> > maybe you
>>>>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will
be
>>>>> highly
>>>>> > appreciated.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Jervis
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>>>> > > Hello All,
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different
>>>>> categories.
>>>>> > But for
>>>>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for
>>>>> different
>>>>> > > roles/processing phases
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for
navigation it
>>>>> > can belong
>>>>> > > to multiple categories
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes,
Sweaters
>>>>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and
those
>>>>> have sub
>>>>> > > categories witin them
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the
item
>>>>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
"cloth rule", leather rule"
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules
is if
>>>>> I
>>>>> > define the
>>>>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot
use it
>>>>> > in Pant
>>>>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a
price
>>>>> rule
>>>>> > in Shirt
>>>>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color"
and "XL Size"
>>>>> then
>>>>> > I will
>>>>> > > have to put it in both categories
>>>>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue
Category" and "XL
>>>>> Rule"
>>>>> > on "XL
>>>>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both
categories.. will it
>>>>> > be an "and"
>>>>> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Regards,
>>>>> > > Amit
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>>>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>>
>>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
1:24 a.m.
You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
Sorry for spamming today
It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
there..
But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
permits me to assign a variable to it
like Equipment(eId : entityId)
but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
Thanks,
Amit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
<mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ok I tried again. :(
In Equipment I only see manufacturer
In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
In Software I do not see anything.
It contains many more classes
Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
it on alias
Thanks
Amit
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
<mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
<mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
issue sometime back with 5.0
Thanks
Amit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
<amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
Its coming from a JAR
Thanks
Amit
Equipment
entityId int
partNumber String
manufacturer String
owningEntityId int
Software
entityId int
OSType String
OSVersion String
imageName String
EquipmentCA extends Equipment
hostname String
productName String
productFamily String
productId String
2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
<mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
a Declarative Model?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
<trikkola(a)redhat.com <mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Its possible that there are some bugs in the
snapshots. Can you tell me
what your model looks like?
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
> The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> They do seem rich in features .. especially
support for
> collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
inbox and global packages.
>
> But But But.. on adding a fact in the
when/then clause then all the
> attributes of the facts are not coming ..
some attributes come.. not
> all of them.
> I am picking it from here
>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
> Any other place I can look :)
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
<amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
<mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jervis!!
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
> <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
<mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
>
> A new feature called "Sharable
artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> available in Drools 5.1. This
feature allows you share an
> asset among
> different packages. It also creates
a global area (you can
> consider it
> as a global package). Potentially
you can promote an asset
> that you
> think is more appropriate to be
defined in a global scope from
> your
> current package to the global area,
so that this global asset
> can be
> reused by every package. This
feature is already on trunk,
> maybe you
> want to give it a try. Any comments
or feedbacks will be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am looking to organize the rules
in different categories.
> But for
> > distribution purposes We are
creating packages for different
> > roles/processing phases
> >
> > So a rule will reside in one
pckage but for navigation it
> can belong
> > to multiple categories
> >
> > So packages are like Shirts,
Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > Categories are Color, Material,
Size, Gender and those have sub
> > categories witin them
> >
> > We have rules which will device
the category of the item
> > Like "red rule", "blue
rule",
"cloth rule", leather rule"
> >
> > Now the problem we are facing is
for category rules is if I
> define the
> > rule in Shirt package .. then I
will not be able ot use it
> in Pant
> > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> >
> > The other problem in this scenario
is If I have a price rule
> in Shirt
> > package and the category is "Blue
Color" and "XL Size" then
> I will
> > have to put it in both categories
> > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
"Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> on "XL
> > Category" and I put the rule in
both categories.. will it
> be an "and"
> > relationship or will be an "OR"
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
9:58 a.m.
It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part
of it).
Best,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com> wrote:
You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
Toni
Amit Kumar wrote:
> Sorry for spamming today
> It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or
"All
> of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
> there..
> But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
> permits me to assign a variable to it
> like Equipment(eId : entityId)
> but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
> in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ok I tried again. :(
>
> In Equipment I only see manufacturer
> In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
> In Software I do not see anything.
>
> It contains many more classes
>
> Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
> model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
> it on alias
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
>
> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>
> But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>
> 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
>
> Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
> and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
> issue sometime back with 5.0
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
> <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Its coming from a JAR
> Thanks
> Amit
>
> Equipment
> entityId int
> partNumber String
> manufacturer String
> owningEntityId int
>
>
>
> Software
> entityId int
> OSType String
> OSVersion String
> imageName String
>
>
>
>
>
>
> EquipmentCA extends Equipment
> hostname String
> productName String
> productFamily String
> productId String
>
> 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>
> Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
> a Declarative Model?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
> <trikkola(a)redhat.com <mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Its possible that there are some bugs in the
> snapshots. Can you tell me
> what your model looks like?
>
> Toni
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
> > They do seem rich in features .. especially
> support for
> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
> inbox and global packages.
> >
> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
> when/then clause then all the
> > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
> some attributes come.. not
> > all of them.
> > I am picking it from here
> >
>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
> > Any other place I can look :)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
> <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
>
> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jervis!!
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
> Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
> <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > A new feature called "Sharable
> artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> > available in Drools 5.1. This
> feature allows you share an
> > asset among
> > different packages. It also creates
> a global area (you can
> > consider it
> > as a global package). Potentially
> you can promote an asset
> > that you
> > think is more appropriate to be
> defined in a global scope from
> > your
> > current package to the global area,
> so that this global asset
> > can be
> > reused by every package. This
> feature is already on trunk,
> > maybe you
> > want to give it a try. Any comments
> or feedbacks will be highly
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jervis
> >
> >
> > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I am looking to organize the rules
> in different categories.
> > But for
> > > distribution purposes We are
> creating packages for different
> > > roles/processing phases
> > >
> > > So a rule will reside in one
> pckage but for navigation it
> > can belong
> > > to multiple categories
> > >
> > > So packages are like Shirts,
> Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > > Categories are Color, Material,
> Size, Gender and those have sub
> > > categories witin them
> > >
> > > We have rules which will device
> the category of the item
> > > Like "red rule", "blue
rule",
> "cloth rule", leather rule"
> > >
> > > Now the problem we are facing is
> for category rules is if I
> > define the
> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
> will not be able ot use it
> > in Pant
> > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> > >
> > > The other problem in this scenario
> is If I have a price rule
> > in Shirt
> > > package and the category is "Blue
> Color" and "XL Size" then
> > I will
> > > have to put it in both categories
> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
> "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> > on "XL
> > > Category" and I put the rule in
> both categories.. will it
> > be an "and"
> > > relationship or will be an "OR"
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Amit
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
> >
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> >
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
10:20 a.m.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514
Model is also there
:)
2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least
a part
of it).
Best,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>
> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>
> Toni
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Sorry for spamming today
> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or
"All
> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
> > there..
> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
> > permits me to assign a variable to it
> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning
capability
> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
> > Thanks,
> > Amit
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Ok I tried again. :(
> >
> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer
> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
> > In Software I do not see anything.
> >
> > It contains many more classes
> >
> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
> > it on alias
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
> >
> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
> >
> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
> > issue sometime back with 5.0
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> >
> > Its coming from a JAR
> > Thanks
> > Amit
> >
> > Equipment
> > entityId int
> > partNumber String
> > manufacturer String
> > owningEntityId int
> >
> >
> >
> > Software
> > entityId int
> > OSType String
> > OSVersion String
> > imageName String
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment
> > hostname String
> > productName String
> > productFamily String
> > productId String
> >
> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
> >
> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
> > a Declarative Model?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
> > <trikkola(a)redhat.com
<mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the
> > snapshots. Can you tell me
> > what your model looks like?
> >
> > Toni
> >
> > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for
> guvnor
> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially
> > support for
> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
> > inbox and global packages.
> > >
> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
> > when/then clause then all the
> > > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
> > some attributes come.. not
> > > all of them.
> > > I am picking it from here
> > >
> >
>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
> > > Any other place I can look :)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Amit
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:
> amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Jervis!!
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
> > Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
> > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > A new feature called "Sharable
> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> > > available in Drools 5.1. This
> > feature allows you share an
> > > asset among
> > > different packages. It also creates
> > a global area (you can
> > > consider it
> > > as a global package). Potentially
> > you can promote an asset
> > > that you
> > > think is more appropriate to be
> > defined in a global scope from
> > > your
> > > current package to the global area,
> > so that this global asset
> > > can be
> > > reused by every package. This
> > feature is already on trunk,
> > > maybe you
> > > want to give it a try. Any comments
> > or feedbacks will be highly
> > > appreciated.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jervis
> > >
> > >
> > > Amit Kumar wrote:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking to organize the rules
> > in different categories.
> > > But for
> > > > distribution purposes We are
> > creating packages for different
> > > > roles/processing phases
> > > >
> > > > So a rule will reside in one
> > pckage but for navigation it
> > > can belong
> > > > to multiple categories
> > > >
> > > > So packages are like Shirts,
> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > > > Categories are Color, Material,
> > Size, Gender and those have sub
> > > > categories witin them
> > > >
> > > > We have rules which will device
> > the category of the item
> > > > Like "red rule", "blue
rule",
> > "cloth rule", leather rule"
> > > >
> > > > Now the problem we are facing is
> > for category rules is if I
> > > define the
> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
> > will not be able ot use it
> > > in Pant
> > > > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> > > >
> > > > The other problem in this scenario
> > is If I have a price rule
> > > in Shirt
> > > > package and the category is
"Blue
> > Color" and "XL Size" then
> > > I will
> > > > have to put it in both categories
> > > > When I put the "Blue Rule"
on
> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> > > on "XL
> > > > Category" and I put the rule in
> > both categories.. will it
> > > be an "and"
> > > > relationship or will be an
"OR"
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Amit
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > rules-users mailing list
> > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> > >
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Esteban Aliverti
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > Esteban Aliverti
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:07 a.m.
I added a comment to your jira entry. Please take a look.
2010/3/17 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514
Model is also there
:)
2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part
> of it).
>
> Best,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>>
>> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>>
>> Toni
>>
>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > Sorry for spamming today
>> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or
"All
>> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
>> > there..
>> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
>> > permits me to assign a variable to it
>> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
>> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning
capability
>> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
>> > Thanks,
>> > Amit
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok I tried again. :(
>> >
>> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
>> > In Software I do not see anything.
>> >
>> > It contains many more classes
>> >
>> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
>> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
>> > it on alias
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>> >
>> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>> >
>> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
>> >
>> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
>> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
>> > issue sometime back with 5.0
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
>> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>> >
>> > Its coming from a JAR
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > Equipment
>> > entityId int
>> > partNumber String
>> > manufacturer String
>> > owningEntityId int
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Software
>> > entityId int
>> > OSType String
>> > OSVersion String
>> > imageName String
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>> > hostname String
>> > productName String
>> > productFamily String
>> > productId String
>> >
>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>> >
>> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
>> > a Declarative Model?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
>> > <trikkola(a)redhat.com
<mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the
>> > snapshots. Can you tell me
>> > what your model looks like?
>> >
>> > Toni
>> >
>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for
>> guvnor
>> > > They do seem rich in features .. especially
>> > support for
>> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
>> > inbox and global packages.
>> > >
>> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
>> > when/then clause then all the
>> > > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
>> > some attributes come.. not
>> > > all of them.
>> > > I am picking it from here
>> > >
>> >
>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>> > > Any other place I can look :)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Amit
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
>> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:
>> amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Jervis!!
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
>> > Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
>> > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > A new feature called "Sharable
>> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>> > > available in Drools 5.1. This
>> > feature allows you share an
>> > > asset among
>> > > different packages. It also creates
>> > a global area (you can
>> > > consider it
>> > > as a global package). Potentially
>> > you can promote an asset
>> > > that you
>> > > think is more appropriate to be
>> > defined in a global scope from
>> > > your
>> > > current package to the global area,
>> > so that this global asset
>> > > can be
>> > > reused by every package. This
>> > feature is already on trunk,
>> > > maybe you
>> > > want to give it a try. Any comments
>> > or feedbacks will be highly
>> > > appreciated.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Jervis
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Amit Kumar wrote:
>> > > > Hello All,
>> > > >
>> > > > I am looking to organize the
rules
>> > in different categories.
>> > > But for
>> > > > distribution purposes We are
>> > creating packages for different
>> > > > roles/processing phases
>> > > >
>> > > > So a rule will reside in one
>> > pckage but for navigation it
>> > > can belong
>> > > > to multiple categories
>> > > >
>> > > > So packages are like Shirts,
>> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>> > > > Categories are Color, Material,
>> > Size, Gender and those have sub
>> > > > categories witin them
>> > > >
>> > > > We have rules which will device
>> > the category of the item
>> > > > Like "red rule",
"blue rule",
>> > "cloth rule", leather rule"
>> > > >
>> > > > Now the problem we are facing is
>> > for category rules is if I
>> > > define the
>> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then I
>> > will not be able ot use it
>> > > in Pant
>> > > > package.. Will have to redefine
it.
>> > > >
>> > > > The other problem in this
scenario
>> > is If I have a price rule
>> > > in Shirt
>> > > > package and the category is
"Blue
>> > Color" and "XL Size" then
>> > > I will
>> > > > have to put it in both categories
>> > > > When I put the "Blue
Rule" on
>> > "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>> > > on "XL
>> > > > Category" and I put the rule
in
>> > both categories.. will it
>> > > be an "and"
>> > > > relationship or will be an
"OR"
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Amit
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > > > rules-users mailing list
>> > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>> > > >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > > rules-users mailing list
>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > >
>> _______________________________________________
>> > > rules-users mailing list
>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> >
>> > Esteban Aliverti
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> >
>> > Esteban Aliverti
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
10:16 a.m.
I do have get/set methods for each attribute. There are some extra files
also which have some other functions.
The same model is working fine in 5.0 and 5.1, its only having issue in the
trunk and I wanted to use the trunk code if possible since it has support
for collect and accumulate in guided editor...
Thanks
Amit
2010/3/18 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
I added a comment to your jira entry. Please take a look.
2010/3/17 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-514
> Model is also there
>
> :)
>
> 2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
>
> It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a
>> part of it).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR
>>>
>>> We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.
>>>
>>> Toni
>>>
>>> Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > Sorry for spamming today
>>> > It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following"
or "All
>>> > of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround
is
>>> > there..
>>> > But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then
it
>>> > permits me to assign a variable to it
>>> > like Equipment(eId : entityId)
>>> > but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning
capability
>>> > in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck
issue.
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Ok I tried again. :(
>>> >
>>> > In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>>> > In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
>>> > In Software I do not see anything.
>>> >
>>> > It contains many more classes
>>> >
>>> > Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
>>> > model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
>>> > it on alias
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
>>> > and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
>>> > issue sometime back with 5.0
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
>>> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com
<mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Its coming from a JAR
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Amit
>>> >
>>> > Equipment
>>> > entityId int
>>> > partNumber String
>>> > manufacturer String
>>> > owningEntityId int
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Software
>>> > entityId int
>>> > OSType String
>>> > OSVersion String
>>> > imageName String
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>>> > hostname String
>>> > productName String
>>> > productFamily String
>>> > productId String
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <
>>> esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
>>> > a Declarative Model?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
>>> > <trikkola(a)redhat.com
<mailto:trikkola@redhat.com
>>> >>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Its possible that there are some bugs in the
>>> > snapshots. Can you tell me
>>> > what your model looks like?
>>> >
>>> > Toni
>>> >
>>> > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > > The latest builds seem to be no good for
>>> guvnor
>>> > > They do seem rich in features ..
especially
>>> > support for
>>> > > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
>>> > inbox and global packages.
>>> > >
>>> > > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
>>> > when/then clause then all the
>>> > > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
>>> > some attributes come.. not
>>> > > all of them.
>>> > > I am picking it from here
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t...
>>> > > Any other place I can look :)
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Amit
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit
Kumar
>>> > <amitkumar(a)gmail.com <mailto:
>>> amitkumar(a)gmail.com>
>>> > > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>>
wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks Jervis!!
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
>>> > Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
>>> > > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > A new feature called
"Sharable
>>> > artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>>> > > available in Drools 5.1. This
>>> > feature allows you share an
>>> > > asset among
>>> > > different packages. It also
creates
>>> > a global area (you can
>>> > > consider it
>>> > > as a global package). Potentially
>>> > you can promote an asset
>>> > > that you
>>> > > think is more appropriate to be
>>> > defined in a global scope from
>>> > > your
>>> > > current package to the global
area,
>>> > so that this global asset
>>> > > can be
>>> > > reused by every package. This
>>> > feature is already on trunk,
>>> > > maybe you
>>> > > want to give it a try. Any
comments
>>> > or feedbacks will be highly
>>> > > appreciated.
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Jervis
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Amit Kumar wrote:
>>> > > > Hello All,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I am looking to organize the
rules
>>> > in different categories.
>>> > > But for
>>> > > > distribution purposes We are
>>> > creating packages for different
>>> > > > roles/processing phases
>>> > > >
>>> > > > So a rule will reside in one
>>> > pckage but for navigation it
>>> > > can belong
>>> > > > to multiple categories
>>> > > >
>>> > > > So packages are like Shirts,
>>> > Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>>> > > > Categories are Color,
Material,
>>> > Size, Gender and those have sub
>>> > > > categories witin them
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We have rules which will
device
>>> > the category of the item
>>> > > > Like "red rule",
"blue rule",
>>> > "cloth rule", leather rule"
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Now the problem we are facing
is
>>> > for category rules is if I
>>> > > define the
>>> > > > rule in Shirt package .. then
I
>>> > will not be able ot use it
>>> > > in Pant
>>> > > > package.. Will have to
redefine
>>> it.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The other problem in this
scenario
>>> > is If I have a price rule
>>> > > in Shirt
>>> > > > package and the category is
"Blue
>>> > Color" and "XL Size" then
>>> > > I will
>>> > > > have to put it in both
categories
>>> > > > When I put the "Blue
Rule" on
>>> > "Blue Category" and "XL
Rule"
>>> > > on "XL
>>> > > > Category" and I put the
rule in
>>> > both categories.. will it
>>> > > be an "and"
>>> > > > relationship or will be an
"OR"
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Amit
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > > rules-users mailing list
>>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>> >
>>> > Esteban Aliverti
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>> >
>>> > Esteban Aliverti
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-users mailing list
>>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5367
days inactive
5392
days old
16 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Amit Kumar -
Esteban Aliverti -
Jervisliu -
Toni Rikkola