2:53 p.m.
Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are trying
to do.
-Michael
_____
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Ronald R.
DiFrango
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: [rules-users] Rules Design Question
All,
I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place
execute other rules based upon the results of the summation.
Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda groups?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
9:08 a.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
Michael,
OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
Step 1: Sum ObjectA
Step 2: Sum ObjectB
Step 3: Sum ObjectC
Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it
fails
Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something if it fails
Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something if it fails
I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda groups
along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them before.
Does that help?
Ron
On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden <mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com> wrote:
Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are trying
to do.
-Michael
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
*Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
All,
I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place execute
other rules based upon the results of the summation.
Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda groups?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
9:26 a.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
Michael,
I got it working, but using Salience alone.
Thanks!
Ron
On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Michael,
OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
Step 1: Sum ObjectA
Step 2: Sum ObjectB
Step 3: Sum ObjectC
Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it
fails
Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something if it fails
Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something if it fails
I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda groups
along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them before.
Does that help?
Ron
On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden <mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com> wrote:
>
> Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are trying
> to do.
>
> -Michael
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
> *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
>
> All,
>
> I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
> different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
> present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place execute
> other rules based upon the results of the summation.
>
> Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda groups?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Ron
>
10:43 a.m.
New subject: import a class
How do i import a java class ( which is in a jar ) in drl file ? is
there special syntax for it .. jar file is in classpath .. thanks
-----------------------------------------
*******************************************************************
*** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error destroy it
immediately. ******************************************************
**************** Wal-Mart Confidential ****************************
******************************************
3:49 p.m.
New subject: import a class
just make sure the jar is in the classpath and the import will find it
like any other class.
Mark
Sanjay Singh - s0singh wrote:
How do i import a java class ( which is in a jar ) in drl file ? is
there special syntax for it .. jar file is in classpath .. thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
*******************************************************************
*** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error destroy it
immediately. ******************************************************
**************** Wal-Mart Confidential ****************************
******************************************
*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3:30 p.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
Here is a question though now, I have the following:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the rules
engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two separate classes
to house the results, but man that seems messy.
On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Michael,
I got it working, but using Salience alone.
Thanks!
Ron
On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
>
> Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it
> fails
> Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> something if it fails
> Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> something if it fails
>
> I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda groups
> along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them before.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Ron
>
> On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are
> > trying to do.
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> > rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
> > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> > *To:* Rules Users List
> > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
> > different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
> > present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place execute
> > other rules based upon the results of the summation.
> >
> > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda
> > groups?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Ron
> >
>
>
3:52 p.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
in trunk you can do:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr != $amt1)
So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Here is a question though now, I have the following:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the
rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two
separate classes to house the results, but man that seems messy.
On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
Michael,
I got it working, but using Salience alone.
Thanks!
Ron
On 4/10/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango * < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
Michael,
OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into
words:
Step 1: Sum ObjectA
Step 2: Sum ObjectB
Step 3: Sum ObjectC
Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something if it fails
Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 &
3 and do something if it fails
Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 &
3 and do something if it fails
I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that
agenda groups along with salience could get me there, but I
have never used them before.
Does that help?
Ron
On 4/6/07, *Michael Rhoden* < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com
<mailto:mrhoden@franklinamerican.com>> wrote:
Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what
you are trying to do.
-Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf
Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
*Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
All,
I have a rules design question for the community. I have
3 lists of different types of objects that I need to sum
if a certain attribute is present on each one of them.
Then after the summing has taken place execute other rules
based upon the results of the summation.
Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or
agenda groups?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:09 p.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to migrate now
prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
On 4/11/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
in trunk you can do:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr !=
$amt1)
So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Here is a question though now, I have the following:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the rules
engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two separate classes
to house the results, but man that seems messy.
On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> I got it working, but using Salience alone.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ron
>
> On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
> >
> > Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> > Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> > Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if
> > it fails
> > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> > something if it fails
> > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> > something if it fails
> >
> > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda
> > groups along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them
> > before.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are
> > > trying to do.
> > >
> > > -Michael
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> > > rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R.
> > > DiFrango
> > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> > > *To:* Rules Users List
> > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
> > > different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
> > > present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place
execute
> > > other rules based upon the results of the summation.
> > >
> > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda
> > > groups?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:10 p.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
Is there a Milestone release that I can use now that contains this change?
On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to migrate now
prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
On 4/11/07, Mark Proctor < mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
>
> in trunk you can do:
> mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr !=
> $amt1)
>
> So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
>
> Mark
>
> Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>
> Here is a question though now, I have the following:
>
> mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
> sumCmAndRnr)
> eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
>
> Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the
> rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two separate
> classes to house the results, but man that seems messy.
>
> On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > I got it working, but using Salience alone.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
> > >
> > > Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> > > Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> > > Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> > > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
something
> > > if it fails
> > > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3
and
> > > do something if it fails
> > > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3
and
> > > do something if it fails
> > >
> > > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda
> > > groups along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them
> > > before.
> > >
> > > Does that help?
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are
> > > > trying to do.
> > > >
> > > > -Michael
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> > > > rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R.
> > > > DiFrango
> > > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> > > > *To:* Rules Users List
> > > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists
> > > > of different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain
attribute is
> > > > present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place
execute
> > > > other rules based upon the results of the summation.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda
> > > > groups?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
>
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
4:25 p.m.
New subject: Rules Design Question
I'm just finalising M2, doing lots of testing here, I think it may even
be more stable than 3.0.6 :) Deadline for final is now end of june.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Is there a Milestone release that I can use now that contains this
change?
On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to
migrate now prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
On 4/11/07, *Mark Proctor* < mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
in trunk you can do:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty,
sumCmAndRnr != $amt1)
So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Here is a question though now, I have the following:
>
> mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
> sumCmAndRnr)
> eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
>
> Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it
> makes the rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is
> to create two separate classes to house the results, but man
> that seems messy.
>
> On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> I got it working, but using Salience alone.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 4/10/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango * <
> ron.difrango(a)gmail.com <mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I
> have into words:
>
> Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
> do something if it fails
> Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from
> Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
> Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from
> Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
>
> I literally need it in this order and I was thinking
> that agenda groups along with salience could get me
> there, but I have never used them before.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 4/6/07, *Michael Rhoden* <
> mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com
> <mailto:mrhoden@franklinamerican.com>> wrote:
>
> Please give a better example or some pseudo code
> of what you are trying to do.
>
> -Michael
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
> *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
>
> All,
>
> I have a rules design question for the
> community. I have 3 lists of different types of
> objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute
> is present on each one of them. Then after the
> summing has taken place execute other rules based
> upon the results of the summation.
>
> Is there a way that I can accomplish this via
> salience or agenda groups?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
>
>
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6439
days inactive
6444
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Mark Proctor -
Michael Rhoden -
Ronald R. DiFrango -
Sanjay Singh - s0singh