Re: [rules-users] issue with 'forall'

By the way you understand that doesn't make sense to do that LHS right? You can do forall(Message()) - Ing. Mauricio Salatino - On May 12, 2010, at 13:52, Michal Bali <michalbali(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > I have encountered the following problem with the latest Drools 5.1 > SNAPSHOT > > I've created a sample Drools project and replaced the Sample.drl > with the following: > --Sample.drl-------------------------------------- > package com.sample > > import com.sample.DroolsTest.Message; > > rule "Hello World" > when > forall( Message( ) > Message() ) > then > System.out.println("executed"); > end > -------------------------------------------- > If I run the sample application like this everything is fine - > "executed" is printed. However, if I modify the main method and > insert some additional fact just before the message fact is > inserted, like this: > --DroolsTest.java----------------------------------- > ..... > ksession.insert(new Object()); > ksession.insert(message); > ..... > ----------------------------------------------------------- > then the rule won't fire any more. > > Please note that if you change the fact insertion order (first the > message then the Object) it will work as expected. > > Is this a bug or am I missing something? I can file a JIRA if needed. > > Thank you! > Best regards, > Michal > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users