Re: [rules-users] semantically equivalent DROOLS L-value expressions?

This still shows R1 as a syntax error in Eclipse .DRL view (Drools 5.2). R2 has no syntax error. Are R1 and R2 semantically the same? rule "R1" //XLS Item=7 when Message( ((businessDayConvention == "foo" && _calendar == "bar") || _calendar== "foo") //syntax error ) then System.out.println( "RULE pattern-matched Message. DROOLS Consequence executing now." ); end BuildError: Unable to Analyse Expression businessDayConvention == "foo" && _calendar == "bar" || _calendar == "foo": [Error: no such identifier: _calendar] [Near : {... vention == "foo" && _calendar == "bar" || _calenda ....}] ^ [Line: 1, Column: 35] rule "R2" //XLS Item=7 when Message (businessDayConvention != "foo" && _calendar == "bar") || Message (businessDayConvention == "foo") then System.out.println( "RULE pattern-matched Message. DROOLS Consequence executing now." ); end -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/semantically-equivalent-DROOLS-L-value-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.