Re: [rules-users] OWL (2 RL) reasoning support
On 11/09/2010 09:29, Semweb Developer wrote:
Hi all,
as far as I know, Drools does not support a built-in ruleset for
reasoning on OWL (2 RL) in the form of triple-based rules.
Is there any custom approach towards this field with a publicly
available ruleset for Drools?
Davide Sottara is working on OWL support via the
Manchester Syntax - we
don't feel exposing RDF tripples to end users is a good idea.
But if the triples are pojos then you can reason over them on the LHS.
Mark
thanks.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.8 KB)