Re: [rules-users] how is Integer converted when comparing with primitive?
On 27/09/2012, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am just guessing now,
but it seems to me that instead of testing lowerBound < value <
upperBuond
it is actually only checking lowerBound < upperBuond because the only way
to avoid that the rule fires is to write a pattern like: Cont( 11 < val <
10
I can confirm your findings. (I should have tested with another
nonnull value outside of the range.)
But as it is, it's just another bug: not diagnosing and compiling in
spite of a syntax error.
Moreover I cannot find any doc stating that we are supporting that format
of
constraints, neither any test in our code base using them.
Ha! Not finding any documentation doesn't mean a thing. I *think*
there was a discussion (on the path from 5.2.0 onwards) about
permitting such (weird) forms of constraints, but I am not sure at
all.
Can you confirm
that this constraint format should be supported by Drools? If so I
will try
to fix it asap.
I'd suggest you just fix the parser so it doesn't accept this and
diagnoses an error.
Thanks
Wolfgang
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/how-is-Integer-converted-when-comparing...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users