Hi ,
Thanks for your quick reply,
the problem that these conditions are on different objects for example
Person(name == "xyz") &&
(Cheese(type == "zzz") OR
Address(street == "1") OR
Phone (number == "xyz") )
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Waleed Zedan
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
Are conditions 2-4 applied to the same pattern type? If so, you can use
the "||" Field Constraint Connective instead of the "or" Conditional
Element:
when
Person( name == "Bob" )
Cheese( type == "brie" || size > 2 || price <= 30 )
then
...
end
These conditions will not generate new rules as the OR CE does...
[]s
Edson
2008/11/30 Waleed Zedan <wzedan(a)gmail.com>
> Hi All,
>
> I have this requirment : Rule A -> Condition 1 AND
> (Condition 2 OR
> Condition 3 OR
> Condition 4)
> The problem is that OR (||) operators in drools are not a short circuiting
> operators like in Java.
>
> May you please tell me an approach to handle this situation , i have
> already tried splitting it on multiple rules ,but i am searching for better
> approach.
>
> I am using Drools 4.0.7.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Waleed Zedan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Waleed Zedan
Senior Software Developer
IT Design & Development Department
Dubai Customs