Re: [rules-users] Temporal operator before[1ms, oo] exhibtis strange behaviour

In STREAM mode, the clock may have to have advanced beyond the latest fact so that certain conditions can be evaluated safely. For instance, another event could still be inserted at the same millisecond. If a condition such as not Event( this coincides $event ) were evaluated prematurely, it would produce an incorrect result. Is this the explanation? -W On 4 November 2010 10:09, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > The .drl: > > declare Leave > @role( event ) > @timestamp( timestamp ) > end > > rule "XXX Leave not !=" > when > $leave: Leave() > not Leave( this != $leave ) > then > System.out.println( "XXX only one Leave - not !=" ); > end > > rule "YYY Leave not after" > when > $leave: Leave() > not Leave( this before $leave ) > then > System.out.println( "YYY only one Leave - not before" ); > end > > > A) The pseudo-clock is advanced according to the timestamp; then > exactly one event Leave is inserted; then fireAllRules() is called. > > 1) Running in CLOUD mode, both rules fire. > 2) But running in STREAM mode, ONLY rule XXX fires. > > B) Like A, but the session clock is advanced by (at least) 1ms > prior to calling fireAllRules(). > > 3) Either mode, both rules fire. > > I think that A2) is incorrect; why should passing another msec change the > logic? > > JIRA? > > Wolfgang > > > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users