Re: [rules-users] Implementing Timers With Drools Persistence Enabled

Hi cafebabe, Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that work item ids are database primary keys but in this simple (very simple) case I just decided to harcoded as I know for a fact that the work item id is 1 because that is the only work item and each time I run the test the tables are dropped and recreated. So, there is never more than one row in the workItemInfo table and the only row always has 1 as its id. I could have stored the work item id or a work item object as a variable (like you mentioned) but in this case wouldn't make a difference for the timers. Are timers working for you when you use persistence? I do complete work items by workItem.getId() in all my code (other than this simple example :)). My problem is NOT completing the work item, my problem is triggering timers when persistence is enabled. The timers don't even trigger, thing that should happen before even trying to complete the work item. Thanks, Nick. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Timers-W... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users