Re: [rules-users] [Drools Planner] Hard constraint appears to be ignored
Hello,
1) TRACE
It did actually crash!
java.lang.IllegalStateException: The presumedScore (0hard/-860soft) is corrupted because
it is not the realScore (0hard/-858soft).
Presumed workingMemory:
Score rule (reward Resource consolidation) has count (44) and weight total (44).
Real workingMemory:
Score rule (reward Resource consolidation) has count (46) and weight total (46).
But the rule causing it looks "normal" to me:
rule "reward Resource consolidation"
when
$leftAssignment : Assignment($project : project, $leftResource : resource != null,
$leftId : id)
$rightAssignment : Assignment(project == $project, resource == $leftResource, id !=
$leftId)
eval(new Duration(Math.abs($leftAssignment.getInterval().getStartMillis() -
$rightAssignment.getInterval().getStartMillis())).getStandardDays() == 0)
then
insertLogical(new IntConstraintOccurrence("reward Resource consolidation",
ConstraintType.POSITIVE
, 1, $leftAssignment, $rightAssignment));
end
2) drools version and planner version
drools-core-5.3.1.Final
drools-planner-core-5.3.1.Final
Thank you for the hints! Is the "eval" causing all this trouble?
br
Reinis
On 02/26/2012 06:45 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
1) If you haven't already, can you turn
on<environmentMode>TRACE</...>
and let it run a while (it will be much slower)?
Report here if that crashes or not.
2) What drools version and what planner version are you using?
Op 26-02-12 17:51, Reinis schreef:
> Hello, it appears that hard constraint I have defined is being ignored
> in some rare cases. Here's an example:
>
> This is what my application logs after getting best solution after
> solver has returned from solve():
>
> 2012-02-23 21:28:54,595 [main] INFO Project Project1 assignment
> 563:[2012-02-27T13:00:00.000/2012-02-27T17:00:00.000] was assigned to John
>
> 2012-02-23 21:28:54,597 [main] INFO Project Project2 assignment
> 508:[2012-02-27T13:00:00.000/2012-02-27T17:00:00.000] was assigned to John
>
> (The log says that John was assigned twice in same time period to two
> different assignments (assignment 563 and assignment 508)
>
> Here short explanation of the relevant domain data
> assignment.id = 563
> assignment.interval = 2012-02-27T13:00:00.000/2012-02-27T17:00:00.000
> assignment.project = Project1
> assignment.resource = John
>
> And this is rule that, to my opinion should've prohibited that two
> assignments get assigned to the same resource:
>
> rule "only one assignment within interval for the same resource"
> when
> $leftAssignment : Assignment($leftId : id, $interval :
> interval, resource != null, $resource : resource)
> $rightAssignment : Assignment(interval == $interval, resource
> == $resource, id != $leftId)
> then
> insertLogical(new IntConstraintOccurrence("only one assignment
> within interval for the same resource", ConstraintType.NEGATIVE_HARD, 1,
> $leftAssignment, $rightAssignment));
> end
>
> The score looks like this:
>
> 2012-02-23 21:28:54,594 [main] DEBUG The hard score is: 0 and the soft
> score is: -532
>
> So no hard constraints are broken according to planner.
>
> My question is not what is wrong with this particular example (unless it
> is obvious for you), but if you can think of any anti-pattern that would
> cause this behavior?
>
> What I already checked is:
> - this happens really sporadically (most of the time the result is
> CORRECT but in 1 from 5 runs I get this kind of error);
> - I checked, re-checked and re-re-checked all the hashCode, compareTo,
> solutionHashCode, solutionCompare, clone, ... methods - they appear to
> be correct;
> - moves are simple and I tried to keep them consistent with the way
> moves in drools-planner examples are constructed;
>
> Would be great if you could give me a hint to what direction I should
> look next.
>
> br
> Reinis
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>