Actually, I was wishing for something similar last night, but for the names of
entry-points. I think it would be nice if you could specify the names of things in DRL
from the values of public static final Strings. (i.e. constants) Do you dev folk think
that's possible enough to make a jira request for it?
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Re: drools-solver - magic name of scoreCalculator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 9:37 AM
Yes, it's not that good that it's a magic name.
However, I don't know any other way to do it.
Feel free to make a jira for it, especially if you know a
better way to do it :)
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Andrew Waterman schreef:
> Thanks Geoffrey! I patched this yesterday with
slf4j-jcl and slf4j-nop for no loging. I'll post the
mavne dependencies later this morning in case others wish to
use non-log4j implementations. :) I did noticeas well that
the "scoreCalculator" global is referenced by name
from the solver. Want me to file a jira issue on that? It
seems strange that the variable name shoudl be static like
that to me.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Adding the slf4j-log4j12 dependency to your
pom.xml should fix it :)
>
> <dependency>
>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
>
<artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
> <scope>runtime</scope>
> </dependency>
>
> Not sure how changing anything in
drools-solver-examples could fix
> it, normally your project wouldn't depend on
it, only on
> drools-solver-core.
>
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> Greg Barton schreef:
>
> I was getting the error below running the
benchmarkNQueens.sh
> script in drools-solver-examples. I got
around it by taking the
> "<scope>runtime</scope>"
line out of the slf4j-log4j12
> dependency in drools-solver-examples/pom.xml.
Not sure if
> that's the right way to get around it, but
it worked. :)
>
> --- On Fri, 2/13/09, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
> From: Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>>
> Subject: [rules-users] Re: drools-solver
-- logger error
> (slf4j binding)?
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 1:04 AM
> drools-score (like hibernate and many
other lib projects)
> just depends on sl4j-api, which is a
logging interface.
> It's up to the end-use product to
decide which logging
> implementation to use under that and how
to configure the
> logging (where to log to, how much to log,
...).
>
> In the drools solver examples I 've
put slf4j-log4j
> underneat it, because I am familiar with
log4j's
> configuration, take a look at their
log4j.xml files. However
> they say that the logback implementation
is better these
> days.
>
>
> PS: I 'll take a look at the other
discussions this
> afternoon.
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
> Andrew Waterman schreef:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the drools-solver.M5
build through Maven
>
> and have gotten the following error while
running my
> project:
>
> SLF4J: Failed to load class
>
>
"org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
>
> SLF4J: See
>
>
http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
> further details.
>
> I've checked my dependency graph,
and
>
> drools-solver references the sl4j-api, but
no
> implementation. I checked the
mvnrepository, and there are
> several other slf4j related projects.
What is the preferred
> binding for JDK1.6?
>
> best wishes,
>
> Andrew
>
> ---------------------------------
> Andrew Waterman
> San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas,
Mexico
> +52 1 967 107 5902
> +1 510 342 5693
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> -- +1 510 342 5693
>
> PO Box 7775 #8750
> San Francisco, California 94120-7775
>
> "Warning: following standard input indefinitely
is ineffective"
> - /bin/tail error message
>
> "Against logic there is no armor like
ignorance."
> - Laurence J. Pete
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users