Re: [rules-users] Dynamic Fact Types

Hi Wolfgang, Many thanks again for your response (I very much appreciate your comprehensive replies to my questions, it is helping me get a clearer idea of what is possible with Drools and the best approach to architecting applications using it). It is a shame that Fact Templates have not been more comprehensively incorporated into the Type Declaration mechanism. Thanks, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-Fact-Types-tp... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.