Re: [rules-users] Trivial rule with condition in RHS won't compile, help please
Well, technically you choose a different dialect because you want different functionality,
so consistency isn't a requirement. I do agree that the difference is not intuitive.
I'm not sure why they're disabled in mvel. Dev d00ds? If the reason is just to
enforce the "you shouldn't have conditions in the RHS" pattern then I
don't think that's sufficient.
--- On Thu, 12/3/09, Barry Kaplan <groups1(a)memelet.com> wrote:
From: Barry Kaplan <groups1(a)memelet.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Trivial rule with condition in RHS won't compile, help
please
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 2:07 PM
Greg Barton wrote:
>
> You can use them in the RHS, but just with java
dialect.
>
This is inconsistent. If they can be used in java, then
they should not be
disabled for mvel.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Trivial-rule-with-condition-in-RHS-won-t-compile-hel...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users