Re: [rules-users] Anyone using JSR94?

Even if you find evidence that nobody is using JSR-94, I still would not nuke it. Technically, it is /the/ Java standard API for inter-operating w/ Rules Engine providers. Every project under the JBoss brand seems to prioritize the merits of its platform stack being 100% open-source and 100% standards compliant. By nuking JSR-94 could DROOLs (technically? politically?) be seen as being delinquent (wrt to this JBoss community priority)? Also, by nuking JSR-94 -- even if no one is using it -- do you risk some other Java based rules engine provider using a FUD-like pitch of "Don't use DROOLs. They use their own proprietary Java API. Ours is JSR-94 compliant, DROOLs is not compliant ...." ? JSR-94 seems like a relatively straightforward specification. Though it may be a nuisance to maintain the necessary API bridges to the DROOLs specific interfaces and implementation capabilities, it /might/ also be worth it to ":just do it" ... if for no other reason than to pre-emptively disarm any potential "DROOLs is not standards compliant!" FUD rantings. On 2/13/2013 5:59 PM, Mark Proctor wrote: