wow, you guys are good, nice observation Raffi I had not considered that but
this is all making me comprehend how Drools works. Actually I think I need
to switch my brain on! Java is so easy it doesn't tend to require much
thought, now I'm having to think about this stuff it hurts :-)
thanks
Richard
Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
On Fri 2.May'08 at 10:05:20 +0100, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>The "when" section matches fact (object) patterns, so your requirement
>could be written as:-
>
>when there is a Test Fact 'A' and another Test Fact 'B' where
"the 'x'
>property of 'A'" equals "the 'y' property of fact
'B' plus 1" then.....
>
>This would become:-
>
>rule "Rule 1"
>when
> Test( $y : y )
> Test( x == ($y + 1) )
Actually, please correct me if I am mistaken, but is this condition
correct? I believe that the original question is that for a single
instance of class Test t, fire the rule when t.x == t.y + 1 (where 't'
refers to the *same* instance of class Test). I believe the rule above
would match any instance of class Test whose x value is equal to the
value of the instance field y from *any* instance of class Test plus 1.
Does that make sense?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/newbie-question-on-%22when%22-condition-syntax-tp17...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.