Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a session do not
connect to Guvnor anyway?
Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a service which
wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could also mock the session.
Although, I must admit I’m not sure what question is being asked...
Steve
On 8 Aug 2014, at 13:07, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I assume you have a service encapsulating your use of Drools?
Why not mock this service to use an implementation that returns what you need?
On 8 August 2014 03:13, san_hegde <santhosh.hegde(a)hp.com> wrote:
Hi ,
We have requirement where in during functional testing we do not want to connect to
Guvnor rather want to mock it.
For example mocking could be like this.
We send Fact object as input during calling knowledgeSession.execute()
method and in rule we update the result in that fact object itself. So here can we mock
the output fact object, so that during functional testing we no need to connect to Guvnor
rather mocked result fact object is returned.
Thank you
Santhosh Hegde A
View this message in context: Mocking Guvnor
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users