Hello,
I would like to have retractArray() similar to insertArray() as indicated in
this thread. But working memory has retract(FactHandle) function rather
retract(Object). Some help please.
kfs2-2 wrote:
There may be a better way but I did it using a function as below:
function void insertArray(WorkingMemory workingMemory, Object[] array)
{
for (int i=0;i<array.length;i++)
{
workingMemory.insert(array[i]);
}
return;
}
...
rule "StarCoApplicants" ruleflow-group "STAR"
dialect "mvel"
when
$creditContract : CreditContract ()
then
insertArray(drools.workingMemory,$creditContract.coApplicantArray);
end
Kent Symanzik
techy <techluver007(a)gmail.com>
Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
02/09/2009 10:15 AM
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
To
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
cc
Subject
Re: [rules-users] Inserting collection of facts in rule Consequence
I would appreciate If someone can clarify this.
Thanks in advance
techy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there way to insert all facts from collection (similar to
> session.execute(collection)) in the rule consequence ?
>
> Thanks!
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inserting-collection-of-facts-in-rule-Consequence-t...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inserting-collection-of-facts-in-rule-Consequence-t...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.