3.0 uses a totally different indexing sub system, so it won't be as
clean to fix, I'm not even sure if it's broken or just not efficient.
But feel free to have a dig.
Mark
Yuri de Wit wrote:
Re: the above performance improvements, what is feasibility of
applying the same solution for 3.x (even if I have to appy the patch
locally, myself)? We have been having the same exact performance
issues corrected by these two bug resolution in an existing app built
on 3.x.
thanks,
-- yuri
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yuri de Wit <ydewit(a)gmail.com>
Date: Aug 30, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: fyi: performance improvements
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
A nice surprise, the latest 4.0.1 GA is running 35% faster than my
patch for the following two JIRA bugs:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1102?page=all
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1101?page=all
So I guess there were additional improvements that made this cut.
For the rest of the list, the above two fixes made my load tests run
200x faster than 4.0.0 GA.
thanks,
-- yuri
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users