Re: [rules-users] Drools Salience and no-loop

No I am not using CEP and I didn't think STREAM mode made a difference. I am just as perplexed as you on why this is happening. Could it be salience is only respected in the same package(these are in different packages )? I am just taking a stab in the dark at this point. I generated audit logs and it can be seen that the removal rule activation is created first and executed first(it looks like 75% of the time based on my test this occurs) laune wrote > > It's difficult to imagine that doing the same thing with equal facts in > identically configured sessions would create differing objects. And it > was the intent of my questions to unearth some irregularity, and to > narrow it down. > > STREAM mode shouldn't matter as you aren't using windows, expiry > or other CEP features - or are you? > > -W > > > On 9 March 2012 15:53, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote: > >> All sessions are against the same kBase. When I say replicate I mean I >> create >> 10000 separate Orders all the same way(same values for all properties). >> I >> have not tried to insert all into one session and fire but can try if >> this >> really makes a difference(though I am not sure why it should). I will >> add >> an >> update to 1 as well but again I am not sure why this would matter to a >> low >> ranking rule who does not care about the actual values from that rule >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Salience-and-no-loop-tp3812723p3... >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@.jboss >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@.jboss > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >