This is because the scenario you are describing is not always an
error/warning. Maybe for you it is an error, but for other people could be a
typical situation. I.e: if you have audit rules.
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @
Yes, I tried QA analysis. But it only can find out the problems of
the
individual rules like what you said. I tried to develop two rules with
sames conditions but different consequences and do the QA analysis, it
cannot detect it unfortunately. :(
2010/12/30 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try it? As
> far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Developer @
http://www.plugtree.com
> - Blog @
http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
> 2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
>
> The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require
>> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation:
>> X($f: foo)
>> Y(bar == $f)
>> as compared to
>> Y($b: bar)
>> X(foo == $b)
>>
>> And you can play this game at any level of complexity.
>>
>> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration
of
>> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in
>> different agenda groups, etc.
>>
>>
>> -W
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com>:
>> > The conflict is like :
>> >
>> > E.g.
>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10;
>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100;
>> >
>> > Can the BRMS detect this?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun <
>> wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please define "conflict".
>> >> -W
>> >>
>> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.fung(a)redhat.com>:
>> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created
>> rules
>> >> > in
>> >> > the BRMS 5.1. Can the QA/Verify can check this out?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun <
>> wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which
"features" and
>> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you
have in mind.
>> >> >> -W
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat(a)gmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule
conflict
>> >> >> > checks?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > rules-users mailing list
>> >> >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Benson Fung
>> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China
>> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan
>> Avenue,
>> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell :
>> 852-98369898
>> >> > ||
>> >> > benson.fung(a)redhat.com ||
http://www.hk.redhat.com||
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > rules-users mailing list
>> >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users