Re: [rules-users] Somewhat strange question: Rules without a RHS

On 16/05/2012, Joe Ammann <joe(a)pyx.ch&gt; wrote: > On 05/15/2012 07:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote: >> Assuming you can get hold of the resulting DRL text, a simple script >> might detect rules where there is nothing between "then" and "end". > I have currently implemented something similar. A REST client that > periodically scans the BRLs in certain Guvnor packages and fills out > missing RHS. Problem is that the users try to test their broken rules > faster than this script can fix them :-/ You can easily design your DSL/DSLR in such a way that the expanded text is jinxed, to be rectified by your scanning script. That way, they won't be able to exec without some Joe's blessing ;-)

> I was looking for exactly that: an option to replace or inject custom > extensions to what you refer to as "Guvnor's validator". But I must > admit that I was not able to find any pointer to this in the doc or > the Guvnor source. Can you point me to the place in the Guvnor source > where that validation actually happens? I might then be able to > develop some ideas. There's drools-verifier-5.4.0.Beta2-sources.jar in Expert's sources. Look at org/drools/verifier/Consequence.drl The first rule is called "No action - possibly commented out".