RE: [rules-users] Guvnor Issues

Thanks for responding. I am evaluating Guvnor for use by non-programmers in my organization. A programmer can figure out how to work around issues, but non-programmers become frustrated quickly, so I think this is important. Are the other two issues I mentioned irrelevant in your opinion? Thanks, Herm From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:19 PM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Issues Regarding #3, it is not a Guvnor issue. In fact, if you are declaring types in the DRL file directly, you will face the same limitation. Feel free to open the Jira for #3 against drools-core/drools-compiler. Can't promise I will be able to get to that any time soon, but it is something I think it is worth doing. []s Edson 2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post@imail.org<mailto:Herman.Post@imail.org>> Hi, I've been working with the Model feature in Guvnor 5.M4 and have some questions: 1. Is there a way to delete a fact type once created? 2. When I declare a field as a Date it gets included as a java.lang.Date and the fact will not validate. 3. If I have created two facts, the one created first cannot reference the second one as the type of a field. The second on can reference the first. It would be nice to support this forward -referencing feature. I'd be happy to enter any of these in Jira if they are not already present (couldn't find them). Thanks, Herm