Good enough. Documentation says that the currently executing
rule is terminated, but I guess that's preferable to a harsh interrupt.
Still, depending on what is being done in RHS code, it doesn't
guarantee a consistent end - but a more radical interrupt will even
be worse.
-W
On 31/12/2013, glambert27 <glambe2(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
So I went with:
ksession.halt();
ksession.clearAgenda();
ksession.dispose();
is this not an ideal solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Interupting-Stateful-session-tp4027464p...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users