Re: [rules-users] Should update be called moving from one rule task to another in a ruleflow

I believe there was some talk of this recently (on perhaps the drools-dev mailing list). IIRC it concluded that this was the expected (system) behaviour of not necessarily the expected (user) behaviour. 2011/7/14 Wishing Carebear <wishing.carebear(a)gmail.com&gt; Thanks Esteban, Noticed that if I have an employee with the list of addresses and update an attribute of the address item in the list, modify does not work and the update needs to be called explicitly on the Employee to take effect. Is this expected. 2011/7/14 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com&gt; No matter the ruleflow-group,  all your rules are running in the same session. If you modify the attributes of a fact, you must notify it to the session (if you want to make inference with this new value). For doing so you can use update() or modify(), they will have the same result. Best regards, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Esteban Aliverti - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com  <http://www.plugtree.com> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com 2011/7/13 Wishing Carebear <wishing.carebear(a)gmail.com&gt; modify _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users