Re: [rules-users] NPE on fact insertion if rule has sliding window

This is fixed in master. Will be in 3.1 final release. Edson 2011/10/7 mike9322 <michael.melton.ctr(a)navy.mil&gt; > > laune wrote: > > > > There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If > > the > > KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some > > type information is not put into the new KBase. > > > > I added the following comment to the JIRA related to this issue > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3145). Cross-posting here in > case > anyone else is having the issue and arrives here via Google like I did. > > "I am seeing the same behavior with my KA newInstance = true. I was able > to > workaround it by ensuring that my event POJOs are defined in the same > package as my rules. > > In other words, this DOES NOT work: > Rule package: com.example.rules > POJO package: com.example.rules.model (import statements included in DRL) > > This DOES work: > Rule package: com.example.rules > POJO package: com.example.rules (no import statements required) > > I did not have to move my event declaration to my DRL; they are still > POJOs. > I would prefer to have my POJOs in their own package but I can live with > this workaround for now." > > Mike > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NPE-on-fact-insertion-if-rule-has-slidi... > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users