Re: [rules-users] Can we use rule "extends" option in decision tables?

Good points. And in fact, decision tables are already designed to do the kind of thing I'm experimenting with using "extends," i.e. they let one put a set of common conditions in one CONDITION column that can be used by one-to-many rules in the table. Is there documentation about how 'extends' works as a rule option? In my experiments so far I see the base rule usually firing before the rule that extends it, but in some cases i see only the extended rule firing, which didn't make sense to me. We're still on 5.2.0.Final though, so maybe things have changed. Don't worry, I'm not going to file a bug report! Just experimenting with this new-to-me feature. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-use-rule-extends-option-in-decis... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.